Paper detail

Finite-size energy gap in weak and strong topological insulators

The non-trivialness of a topological insulator (TI) is characterized either by a bulk topological invariant or by the existence of a protected metallic surface state. Yet, in realistic samples of finite size this non-trivialness does not necessarily guarantee the gaplessness of the surface state. Depending on the geometry and on the topological indices, a finite-size energy gap of different nature can appear, and correspondingly, exhibits various scaling behaviors of the gap. The spin-to-surface locking provides one of such gap-opening mechanisms, resulting in a power-law scaling of the energy gap. Weak and strong TI's show different degrees of sensitivity to the geometry of the sample. As a noteworthy example, a strong TI nanowire of a rectangular prism shape is shown to be more gapped than that of a weak TI of precisely the same geometry.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.