Paper detail

Finding a Large Submatrix of a Gaussian Random Matrix

We consider the problem of finding a $k\times k$ submatrix of an $n\times n$ matrix with i.i.d. standard Gaussian entries, which has a large average entry. It was shown earlier by Bhamidi et al. that the largest average value of such a matrix is $2\sqrt{\log n/k}$ with high probability. In the same paper an evidence was provided that a natural greedy algorithm called Largest Average Submatrix ($\LAS$) should produce a matrix with average entry approximately $\sqrt{2}$ smaller. In this paper we show that the matrix produced by the $\LAS$ algorithm is indeed $\sqrt{2\log n/k}$ w.h.p. Then by drawing an analogy with the problem of finding cliques in random graphs, we propose a simple greedy algorithm which produces a $k\times k$ matrix with asymptotically the same average value. Since the greedy algorithm is the best known algorithm for finding cliques in random graphs, it is tempting to believe that beating the factor $\sqrt{2}$ performance gap suffered by both algorithms might be very challenging. Surprisingly, we show the existence of a very simple algorithm which produces a matrix with average value $(4/3)\sqrt{2\log n/k}$. To get an insight into the algorithmic hardness of this problem, and motivated by methods originating in the theory of spin glasses, we conduct the so-called expected overlap analysis of matrices with average value asymptotically $α\sqrt{2\log n/k}$. The overlap corresponds to the number of common rows and common columns for pairs of matrices achieving this value. We discover numerically an intriguing phase transition at $α^*\approx 1.3608..$: when $α<α^*$ the space of overlaps is a continuous subset of $[0,1]^2$, whereas $α=α^*$ marks the onset of discontinuity, and the model exhibits the Overlap Gap Property when $α>α^*$. We conjecture that $α>α^*$ marks the onset of the algorithmic hardness.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.