Paper detail

Factorizations of the same length in abelian monoids

Let $\mathcal S \subseteq \mathbb Z^m \oplus T$ be a finitely generated and reduced monoid. In this paper we develop a general strategy to study the set of elements in $\mathcal S$ having at least two factorizations of the same length, namely the ideal $\mathcal L_{\mathcal S}$. To this end, we work with a certain (lattice) ideal associated to the monoid $\mathcal S$. Our study can be seen as a new approach generalizing \cite{chapman:2011}, which only studies the case of numerical semigroups. When $\mathcal S$ is a numerical semigroup we give three main results: (1) we compute explicitly a set of generators of the ideal $\mathcal L_{\mathcal S}$ when $\mathcal S$ is minimally generated by an almost arithmetic sequence; (2) we provide an infinite family of numerical semigroups such that $\mathcal L_{\mathcal S}$ is a principal ideal; (3) we classify the computational problem of determining the largest integer not in $\mathcal L_{\mathcal S}$ as an $\mathcal{NP}$-hard problem.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.