Paper detail

$f_1(1285)$ decays into $a_0(980)π^0$, $f_0(980)π^0$ and isospin breaking

We evaluate the decay width for the processes $f_1(1285) \to π^0 a_0(980)$ and $f_1(1285) \to π^0 f_0(980)$ taking into account that all three resonances are dynamically generated from the meson-meson interaction, the $f_1(1285)$ from $K^* \bar K -c.c$ and the $a_0(980)$, $f_0(980)$ from $πη, K \bar K$ and $ππ, K \bar K$ respectively. We use a triangular mechanism similar to that of the $η(1405) \to ππη$, which provides a decay width for $f_1(1285) \to π^0 a_0(980)$ with a branching fraction of the order of 30%, in agreement with experiment. At the same time we evaluate the decay width for the isospin forbidden $f_1(1285) \to π^0 f_0(980)$, which appears when we consider different masses for the charged and neutral kaons, and show that it is much more suppressed than in the $η(1405) \to ππη$ case, but gives rise to a narrow shape of the $π^+ π^-$ distribution similar to the one found in the $η(1405) \to ππη$ decay.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.