Paper detail

Extremely low inhomogeneous broadening of exciton lines in shallow (In,Ga)As/GaAs quantum wells

We study radiative linewidth of exciton resonance in shallow In$_x$Ga$_{1-x}$As/GaAs single quantum wells as a function of indium concentration in the range $x=0.02...0.10$ and well thickness in the range $L_Z=1...30$ nm using the method of Brewster reflection spectroscopy. Record linewidths of heavy-hole exciton resonance of about 130...180 $μ$eV are measured in reflection spectra for single quantum wells with $L_Z=2$ nm and $x=0.02$ at temperature 9 K. In these spectra, the non-radiative linewidth including inhomogeneous broadening can be comparable or even less than radiative linewidth. It is shown that radiative linewidth weakly depends on $x$ and $L_Z$ in these ranges. In multiple-quantum-well Bragg structure with ten periods radiative linewidth exceeds inhomogeneous broadening by 4 times.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.