Paper detail

Extract Dynamic Information To Improve Time Series Modeling: a Case Study with Scientific Workflow

In modeling time series data, we often need to augment the existing data records to increase the modeling accuracy. In this work, we describe a number of techniques to extract dynamic information about the current state of a large scientific workflow, which could be generalized to other types of applications. The specific task to be modeled is the time needed for transferring a file from an experimental facility to a data center. The key idea of our approach is to find recent past data transfer events that match the current event in some ways. Tests showed that we could identify recent events matching some recorded properties and reduce the prediction error by about 12% compared to the similar models with only static features. We additionally explored an application specific technique to extract information about the data production process, and was able to reduce the average prediction error by 44%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.