Paper detail

External beam irradiation angle measurement using Cerenkov emission

Due to its angular dependency, Cerenkov light has long been considered a contamination signal in plastic scintillating dosimeters. In this study, we propose a novel approach designed to take advantage of this angular dependency to perform a direct measurement of an external beam radiation angle of incidence. A Cerenkov probe composed of a 10-mm long filtered sensitive volume of clear PMMA optical fibre was built. Both filtered and raw Cerenkov signals from the transport fibre were collected through a single 1-mm diameter transport fibre. An independent PSD composed of 10-mm BCF12 scintillating fibre was also used for simultaneous dose measurements. A first series of measurements aimed at validating the ability to account for the Cerenkov electron energy spectrum dependency by simultaneously measuring the deposited dose. A cylindrical phantom was then used to obtain an angular calibration curve for fixed dose irradiations and perform incident angle measurements using electron and photon beams. The beam nominal energy was found to have a significant impact on the shapes of the angular calibration curves obtained for irradiation angle measurements. This can be linked to the electron energy spectrum dependency of the Cerenkov emission cone. Irradiation angle measurements exhibit an absolute mean error of 1.86° and 1.02° at 6 and 18 MV, respectively. Similar results were obtained with electron beams and the absolute mean error reaches 1.97, 1.66, 1.45 and 0.95 degrees at 9, 12, 16 and 20 MeV, respectively. Reducing the numerical aperture of the Cerenkov probe leads to an increased angular dependency for the lowest energy while no major changes were observed at higher energy. This allowed irradiation angle measurements at 6 MeV with a mean absolute error of 4.82°. The detector offers promising perspectives for external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy applications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.