Paper detail

Exact recoverability from dense corrupted observations via $L_1$ minimization

This paper confirms a surprising phenomenon first observed by Wright \textit{et al.} \cite{WYGSM_Face_2009_J} \cite{WM_denseError_2010_J} under different setting: given $m$ highly corrupted measurements $y = A_{Ω\bullet} x^{\star} + e^{\star}$, where $A_{Ω\bullet}$ is a submatrix whose rows are selected uniformly at random from rows of an orthogonal matrix $A$ and $e^{\star}$ is an unknown sparse error vector whose nonzero entries may be unbounded, we show that with high probability $\ell_1$-minimization can recover the sparse signal of interest $x^{\star}$ exactly from only $m = C μ^2 k (\log n)^2$ where $k$ is the number of nonzero components of $x^{\star}$ and $μ= n \max_{ij} A_{ij}^2$, even if nearly 100% of the measurements are corrupted. We further guarantee that stable recovery is possible when measurements are polluted by both gross sparse and small dense errors: $y = A_{Ω\bullet} x^{\star} + e^{\star}+ ν$ where $ν$ is the small dense noise with bounded energy. Numerous simulation results under various settings are also presented to verify the validity of the theory as well as to illustrate the promising potential of the proposed framework.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.