Paper detail

Exact Multivariate Two-Sample Density-Based Empirical Likelihood Ratio Tests Applicable to Retrospective and Group Sequential Studies

Nonparametric tests for equality of multivariate distributions are frequently desired in research. It is commonly required that test-procedures based on relatively small samples of vectors accurately control the corresponding Type I Error (TIE) rates. Often, in the multivariate testing, extensions of null-distribution-free univariate methods, e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramer-von Mises type schemes, are not exact, since their null distributions depend on underlying data distributions. The present paper extends the density-based empirical likelihood technique in order to nonparametrically approximate the most powerful test for the multivariate two-sample (MTS) problem, yielding an exact finite-sample test statistic. We rigorously establish and apply one-to-one-mapping between the equality of vectors distributions and the equality of distributions of relevant univariate linear projections. In this framework, we prove an algorithm that simplifies the use of projection pursuit, employing only a few of the infinitely many linear combinations of observed vectors components. The displayed distribution-free strategy is employed in retrospective and group sequential manners. The asymptotic consistency of the proposed technique is shown. Monte Carlo studies demonstrate that the proposed procedures exhibit extremely high and stable power characteristics across a variety of settings. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.