Paper detail

Equilibrium phases and domain growth kinetics of calamitic liquid crystals

The anisotropic shape of calamitic LC particles results in distinct energy values when nematogens are placed side-by-side or end-to-end. The energy anisotropy governed by parameter K&#39; has deep consequences on equilibrium & non-equilibrium properties. Using GB model, which shows Nm & low temperature Sm order, we undertake large-scale MC & MD simulations to probe effect of K&#39; on the equilibrium phase diagram & the non-equilibrium domain growth following a quench in the temperature T (coarsening). There are 2 transitions in the model, I->Nm at Tc1 & Nm->Sm at Tc2<Tc1. K&#39; decreases Tc1 significantly, but has relatively little effect on Tc2. Domain growth in Nm phase exhibits the well-known LAC law, L(t)~t^0.5 & evolution is via annihilation of string defects. The system exhibits dynamical scaling that is also robust with respect to K&#39;. We find that Sm phase at quench temperatures T (T>Tc1->T<Tc2) that we consider has SmB order with a hexatic arrangement of the LC molecules in the layers. Coarsening in this phase exhibits a striking two-time-scale scenario: first the LC molecules align & develop orientational order, followed by emergence of characteristic layering along with the hexatic bond-orientational-order within layers. Consequently, the growth follows the LAC law L(t)~t^0.5 at early times & then shows a sharp crossover to a slower growth regime at later times. Our observations strongly suggest L(t)~t^0.25 in this regime. Interestingly, the correlation function shows dynamical scaling in both the regimes & the scaling function is universal. The dynamics is also robust with respect to changes in K&#39;, but the smecticity is more pronounced at larger values. Further, the early-time dynamics is governed by string defects, while the late-time evolution is dictated by interfacial defects. We believe this scenario is generic to Sm phase even with other kinds of local order within Sm layers.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.