Researcher profile

Tom L. Underwood

Tom L. Underwood contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Equilibrium phases and domain growth kinetics of calamitic liquid crystals

The anisotropic shape of calamitic LC particles results in distinct energy values when nematogens are placed side-by-side or end-to-end. The energy anisotropy governed by parameter K&#39; has deep consequences on equilibrium & non-equilibrium properties. Using GB model, which shows Nm & low temperature Sm order, we undertake large-scale MC & MD simulations to probe effect of K&#39; on the equilibrium phase diagram & the non-equilibrium domain growth following a quench in the temperature T (coarsening). There are 2 transitions in the model, I->Nm at Tc1 & Nm->Sm at Tc2<Tc1. K&#39; decreases Tc1 significantly, but has relatively little effect on Tc2. Domain growth in Nm phase exhibits the well-known LAC law, L(t)~t^0.5 & evolution is via annihilation of string defects. The system exhibits dynamical scaling that is also robust with respect to K&#39;. We find that Sm phase at quench temperatures T (T>Tc1->T<Tc2) that we consider has SmB order with a hexatic arrangement of the LC molecules in the layers. Coarsening in this phase exhibits a striking two-time-scale scenario: first the LC molecules align & develop orientational order, followed by emergence of characteristic layering along with the hexatic bond-orientational-order within layers. Consequently, the growth follows the LAC law L(t)~t^0.5 at early times & then shows a sharp crossover to a slower growth regime at later times. Our observations strongly suggest L(t)~t^0.25 in this regime. Interestingly, the correlation function shows dynamical scaling in both the regimes & the scaling function is universal. The dynamics is also robust with respect to changes in K&#39;, but the smecticity is more pronounced at larger values. Further, the early-time dynamics is governed by string defects, while the late-time evolution is dictated by interfacial defects. We believe this scenario is generic to Sm phase even with other kinds of local order within Sm layers.

preprint2020arXiv

Phase behaviour of the quantum Lennard-Jones solid

The Lennard-Jones potential is perhaps one of the most widely-used models for the interaction of uncharged particles, such as noble gas solids. The phase diagram of the classical LJ solid is known to exhibit transitions between hcp and fcc phases. However, the phase behaviour of the quantum Lennard-Jones solid remains unknown. Thermodynamic integration based on path integral molecular dynamics and lattice dynamics calculations are used to study the phase stability of the hcp and fcc Lennard-Jones solids. The hcp phase is shown to be stabilized by quantum effects in PIMD while fcc is shown to be favoured by lattice dynamics, which suggests a possible re-entrant low pressure hcp phase for highly quantum systems. Implications for the phase stability of noble gas solids are discussed. For parameters equating to Helium, the expansion due to zero-point vibrations is associated with quantum melting: neither crystal structure is stable at zero pressure.