Paper detail

Enhancing Oceanic Variables Forecast in the Santos Channel by Estimating Model Error with Random Forests

In this work we improve forecasting of Sea Surface Height (SSH) and current velocity (speed and direction) in oceanic scenarios. We do so by resorting to Random Forests so as to predict the error of a numerical forecasting system developed for the Santos Channel in Brazil. We have used the Santos Operational Forecasting System (SOFS) and data collected in situ between the years of 2019 and 2021. In previous studies we have applied similar methods for current velocity in the channel entrance, in this work we expand the application to improve the SHH forecast and include four other stations in the channel. We have obtained an average reduction of 11.9% in forecasting Root-Mean Square Error (RMSE) and 38.7% in bias with our approach. We also obtained an increase of Agreement (IOA) in 10 of the 14 combinations of forecasted variables and stations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.