Paper detail

Enhancing Mechanical Metamodels with a Generative Model-Based Augmented Training Dataset

Modeling biological soft tissue is complex in part due to material heterogeneity. Microstructural patterns, which play a major role in defining the mechanical behavior of these tissues, are both challenging to characterize, and difficult to simulate. Recently, machine learning-based methods to predict the mechanical behavior of heterogeneous materials have made it possible to more thoroughly explore the massive input parameter space associated with heterogeneous blocks of material. Specifically, we can train machine learning (ML) models to closely approximate computationally expensive heterogeneous material simulations where the ML model is trained on a dataset of simulations that capture the range of spatial heterogeneity present in the material of interest. However, when it comes to applying these techniques to biological tissue more broadly, there is a major limitation: the relevant microstructural patterns are both challenging to obtain and difficult to analyze. Consequently, the number of useful examples available to characterize the input domain under study is limited. In this work, we investigate the efficacy of ML-based generative models as well as procedural methods as a tool for augmenting limited input pattern datasets. We find that a Style-based Generative Adversarial Network with adaptive discriminator augmentation is able to successfully leverage just 1,000 example patterns to create the most authentic generated patterns. In general, diverse generated patterns with adequate resemblance to the real patterns can be used as inputs to finite element simulations to meaningfully augment the training dataset. To enable this methodological contribution, we have created an open access dataset of Finite Element Analysis simulations based on Cahn-Hilliard patterns. We anticipate that future researchers will be able to leverage this dataset and build on the work presented here.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.