Researcher profile

Emma Lejeune

Emma Lejeune contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Enhancing Mechanical Metamodels with a Generative Model-Based Augmented Training Dataset

Modeling biological soft tissue is complex in part due to material heterogeneity. Microstructural patterns, which play a major role in defining the mechanical behavior of these tissues, are both challenging to characterize, and difficult to simulate. Recently, machine learning-based methods to predict the mechanical behavior of heterogeneous materials have made it possible to more thoroughly explore the massive input parameter space associated with heterogeneous blocks of material. Specifically, we can train machine learning (ML) models to closely approximate computationally expensive heterogeneous material simulations where the ML model is trained on a dataset of simulations that capture the range of spatial heterogeneity present in the material of interest. However, when it comes to applying these techniques to biological tissue more broadly, there is a major limitation: the relevant microstructural patterns are both challenging to obtain and difficult to analyze. Consequently, the number of useful examples available to characterize the input domain under study is limited. In this work, we investigate the efficacy of ML-based generative models as well as procedural methods as a tool for augmenting limited input pattern datasets. We find that a Style-based Generative Adversarial Network with adaptive discriminator augmentation is able to successfully leverage just 1,000 example patterns to create the most authentic generated patterns. In general, diverse generated patterns with adequate resemblance to the real patterns can be used as inputs to finite element simulations to meaningfully augment the training dataset. To enable this methodological contribution, we have created an open access dataset of Finite Element Analysis simulations based on Cahn-Hilliard patterns. We anticipate that future researchers will be able to leverage this dataset and build on the work presented here.

preprint2022arXiv

Learning Mechanically Driven Emergent Behavior with Message Passing Neural Networks

From designing architected materials to connecting mechanical behavior across scales, computational modeling is a critical tool in solid mechanics. Recently, there has been a growing interest in using machine learning to reduce the computational cost of physics-based simulations. Notably, while machine learning approaches that rely on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown success in learning mechanics, the performance of GNNs has yet to be investigated on a myriad of solid mechanics problems. In this work, we examine the ability of GNNs to predict a fundamental aspect of mechanically driven emergent behavior: the connection between a column's geometric structure and the direction that it buckles. To accomplish this, we introduce the Asymmetric Buckling Columns (ABC) dataset, a dataset comprised of three sub-datasets of asymmetric and heterogeneous column geometries where the goal is to classify the direction of symmetry breaking (left or right) under compression after the onset of instability. Because of complex local geometry, the "image-like" data representations required for implementing standard convolutional neural network based metamodels are not ideal, thus motivating the use of GNNs. In addition to investigating GNN model architecture, we study the effect of different input data representation approaches, data augmentation, and combining multiple models as an ensemble. While we were able to obtain good results, we also showed that predicting solid mechanics based emergent behavior is non-trivial. Because both our model implementation and dataset are distributed under open-source licenses, we hope that future researchers can build on our work to create enhanced mechanics-specific machine learning pipelines for capturing the behavior of complex geometric structures.

preprint2022arXiv

Towards out of distribution generalization for problems in mechanics

There has been a massive increase in research interest towards applying data driven methods to problems in mechanics. While traditional machine learning (ML) methods have enabled many breakthroughs, they rely on the assumption that the training (observed) data and testing (unseen) data are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d). Thus, traditional ML approaches often break down when applied to real world mechanics problems with unknown test environments and data distribution shifts. In contrast, out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization assumes that the test data may shift (i.e., violate the i.i.d. assumption). To date, multiple methods have been proposed to improve the OOD generalization of ML methods. However, because of the lack of benchmark datasets for OOD regression problems, the efficiency of these OOD methods on regression problems, which dominate the mechanics field, remains unknown. To address this, we investigate the performance of OOD generalization methods for regression problems in mechanics. Specifically, we identify three OOD problems: covariate shift, mechanism shift, and sampling bias. For each problem, we create two benchmark examples that extend the Mechanical MNIST dataset collection, and we investigate the performance of popular OOD generalization methods on these mechanics-specific regression problems. Our numerical experiments show that in most cases, while the OOD generalization algorithms perform better compared to traditional ML methods on these OOD problems, there is a compelling need to develop more robust OOD generalization methods that are effective across multiple OOD scenarios. Overall, we expect that this study, as well as the associated open access benchmark datasets, will enable further development of OOD generalization methods for mechanics specific regression problems.