Paper detail

Enhanced negative type for finite metric trees

Finite metric trees are known to have strict 1-negative type. In this paper we introduce a new family of inequalities that quantify the extent of the "strictness" of the 1-negative type inequalities for finite metric trees. These inequalities of "enhanced 1-negative type" are sufficiently strong to imply that any given finite metric tree must have strict p-negative type for all values of p in an open interval that contains the number 1. Moreover, these open intervals can be characterized purely in terms of the unordered distribution of edge weights that determine the path metric on the particular tree, and are therefore largely independent of the tree's internal geometry. From these calculations we are able to extract a new non linear technique for improving lower bounds on the maximal p-negative type of certain finite metric spaces. Some pathological examples are also considered in order to stress certain technical points.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.