Paper detail

Empirical likelihood inference for longitudinal data with covariate measurement errors: An application to the LEAN study

Measurement errors usually arise during the longitudinal data collection process. Ignoring the effects of measurement errors will lead to invalid estimates. The Lifestyle Education for Activity and Nutrition (LEAN) study was designed to assess the effectiveness of intervention for enhancing weight loss over nine months. The covariates systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at baseline, month 4, and month 9. At each assessment time, there were two replicate measurements for SBP and DBP. The replicate measurement errors of SBP follow different distributions, as does DBP. To account for the distributional difference of replicate measurement errors, a new method for analyzing longitudinal data with replicate covariate measurement errors is developed based on the empirical likelihood method. The asymptotic properties of the proposed estimator are established under some regularity conditions. The confidence region for the parameters of interest can be constructed based on the chi-squared approximation without estimating the covariance matrix. Additionally, the proposed empirical likelihood estimator is asymptotically more efficient than the estimator of Lin et al. (2018). Extensive simulations demonstrate that the proposed method can eliminate the effects of measurement errors in the covariate and has a high estimation efficiency. The proposed method indicates the significant effect of the intervention on BMI in the LEAN study.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.