Paper detail

Elicitation of Weibull priors

Based on expert opinions, informative prior elicitation for the common Weibull lifetime distribution usually presents some difficulties since it requires to elicit a two-dimensional joint prior. We consider here a reliability framework where the available expert information states directly in terms of prior predictive values (lifetimes) and not parameter values, which are less intuitive. The novelty of our procedure is to weigh the expert information by the size m of a virtual sample yielding a similar information, the prior being seen as a reference posterior. Thus, the prior calibration by the Bayesian analyst, who has to moderate the subjective information with respect to the data information, is made simple. A main result is the full tractability of the prior under mild conditions, despite the conjugation issues encountered with the Weibull distribution. Besides, m is a practical focus point for discussion between analysts and experts, and a helpful parameter for leading sensitivity studies and reducing the potential imbalance in posterior selection between Bayesian Weibull models, which can be due to favoring arbitrarily a prior. The calibration of m is discussed and a real example is treated along the paper.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.