Paper detail

Electronic Raman-scattering study of low-energy excitations in single and double CuO_2-layer Tl-Ba-(Ca)-Cu-O superconductors

Low energy Raman continuum and the redistribution of the continuum to a peak (2Δ-peak) in the superconducting state have been studied in Tl-Ba-(Ca)-Cu-O superconductors with single (Tl-2201) and double (Tl-2212) CuO_2 layer. The 2Δ/k_BT_c ratios in A_1g and B_1g symmetries are larger for Tl-2212 than for Tl-2201. The B_1g/A_1g gap ratio is also larger in Tl-2212. The A_1g intensities of the continuum and the 2Δ-peak are significantly weaker than the B_1g intensities in Tl-2201, but are comparable in Tl-2212. This shows that the Coulomb screening is much stronger in Tl-2201. The change from Tl-2201 to Tl-2212 of the normalized A_1g 2Δ-peak intensity is identical within experimental error to that of normalized A_1g continuum intensity. This suggests that the excitations forming the 2Δ-peak and the continuum couple to light by the same mechanism.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.