Paper detail

Electromagnetic-Magnetoelectric Duality for Waveguides

We develop a theory for waveguides that respects the duality of electromagnetism, namely the symmetry of the equations arising through inclusion of magnetic monopoles in addition to including electrons (electric monopoles). The term magnetoelectric potential is sometimes used to signify the magnetic-monopole induced dual to the usual electromagnetic potential. To this end, we introduce a general theory for describing modes and characteristics of waveguides based on mixed-monopole materials, with both electric and magnetic responses. Our theory accommodates exotic media such as double-negative, near-zero and zero-index materials, and we demonstrate that our general theory exhibits the electromagnetic duality that would arise if we were to incorporate magnetic monopoles into the media. We consider linear, homogeneous, isotropic waveguide materials with slab and cylindrical geometries. To ensure manifest electromagnetic duality, we construct generic electromagnetic susceptibilities that are dual in both electric charges and magnetic monopoles using a generalized Drude-Lorentz model that manifests this duality. Our model reduces to standard cases in appropriate limits. We consider metamaterials and metamaterial waveguides, as well as metal guides, as examples of waveguides constructed of mixed-monopole materials, to show the generality of our waveguide theory. In particular, we show that, in slab and cylindrical waveguides, exchanging electric and magnetic material properties leads to the exchange of transverse magnetic and transverse electric modes and dispersion equations, which suggests a good test of the potential duality of waveguides. This theory has the capability to predict waveguide behavior under an exchange of electromagnetic parameters from the dual waveguide.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.