Paper detail

Electrical Characterization of 180 nm ATLASPix2 HV-CMOS Monolithic Prototypes for the High-Luminosity LHC

We report on the experimental study made on a successive prototype of High-Voltage CMOS (HV-CMOS) ATLASPix2 sensor for the tracking detector application, developed with 180 nm feature size. These sensors are to qualify mainly the peripheral data processing blocks (e.g. Command Decoder, Trigger Buffer, etc.). It is a smaller version of 24 X 36 pixelated sensor in comparison to the earlier generation of ATLASPix1 fabricated in both ams AG, Austria, and TSI Semiconductors, USA. While ams produced ATLASPix2 showed breakdown voltage 50 V in nonirradiated condition as it was seen on its predecessors ATLASpix1, TSI produced prototypes reported breakdown voltage greater than 100 V. The chosen wafer of MCz 20 Ohm.cm P-type substrate resistivity can deplete a few tenths of um, where the process-driven surface damage can have a greater impact on device operating conditions before and after irradiation. In an aim to understand device intrinsic performance at the irradiated case, a dedicated neutron irradiation campaign has been made at JSI for different fluences. Characterizations have been performed at different temperatures after irradiation to analyze the leakage current and breakdown voltage before and after irradiation. TSI prototypes showed a breakdown voltage decrease 90 V due to impact ionization and enhanced effective doping concentration. Results demonstrated for the neutron-irradiated devices up to the fluence of 2 X 10^15 neq/cm2 can still safely be operated at a voltage high enough to allow for high efficiency. Accelerated Annealing steps also made on selective irradiated ATLASPix2 samples, equivalent to more than two years of room-temperature annealing (at 20 degC), and they showed the reassuring expected breakdown voltage increase and damage constant rate alpha^* (geometry dependent) decrease, driven by the beneficial annealing.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.