Paper detail

Efficient Polling Protocol for Decentralized Social Networks

We address the polling problem in social networks where individuals collaborate to choose the most favorite choice amongst some options, without divulging their vote and publicly exposing their potentially malicious actions. Given this social interaction model, Guerraoui et al. recently proposed polling protocols that do not rely on any central authority or cryptography system, using a simple secret sharing scheme along with verification procedures to accurately compute the poll's final result. However, these protocols can be deployed safely and efficiently provided that, inter alia, the social graph structure should be transformed into a ring structure-based overlay and the number of participating users is perfect square. Consequently, designing \emph{secure} and \emph{efficient} polling protocols regardless these constraints remains a challenging issue. In this paper, we present EPol, a simple decentralized polling protocol that relies on the current state of social graphs. More explicitly, we define one family of social graphs that satisfy what we call the $m$-broadcasting property (where $m$ is less than or equal to the minimum node degree) and show their structures enable low communication cost and constitute necessary and sufficient condition to ensure vote privacy and limit the impact of dishonest users on the accuracy of the polling output. Our protocol is effective to compute more precisely the final result. Furthermore, despite the use of richer social graph structures, the communication and spatial complexities of EPol are close to be linear.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.