Paper detail

Effects of magnetism and electric field on the energy gap of bilayer graphene nanoflakes

We study the effect of magnetism and perpendicular external electric field strengths on the energy gap of length confined bilayer graphene nanoribbons (or nanoflakes) as a function of ribbon width and length using a \textit{first principles} density functional electronic structure method and a semi-local exchange-correlation approximation. We assume AB (Bernal) bilayer stacking and consider both armchair and zigzag edges, and for each edge type, we consider the two edge alignments, namely, $α$ and $β$ edge alignment. For the armchair nanoflakes we identify three distinct classes of bilayer energy gaps, determined by the number of carbon chains in the width direction ({\it N} = 3{\it p}, 3{\it p}+1 and 3{\it p}+2, {\it p} is an integer), and the gaps decrease with increasing width except for class 3{\it p}+2 armchair nanoribbons. Metallic-like behavior seen in armchair bilayer nanoribbons are found to be absent in armchair nanoflakes. Class 3{\it p}+2 armchair nanoflakes show significant length dependence. We find that the gaps decrease with the applied electric fields due to large intrinsic gap of the nanoflake. The existence of a critical gap with respect to the applied field, therefore, is not predicted by our calculations. Magnetism between the layers plays a major role in enhancing the gap values resulting from the geometrical confinement, hinting at an interplay of magnetism and geometrical confinement in finite size bilayer graphene.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.