Paper detail

Effect of Greenhouse Gases on Thermal Emissivity by Clouds

Greenhouse gases, most importantly water vapor, increase the emissivity and decrease the albedo of clouds for thermal radiation. The modifications, which can be of order 10% for optically thick clouds, depend on the attenuation coefficient $α^{\{g\}}$ of the greenhouse gases, and also on the attenuation coefficient, $α^{\{c\}}$, the single-scattering albedo $\tilde ω^{\{c\}}$, and the scattering phase function $p^{\{c\}}(μ,μ')$ of the cloud particulates. Cold, high-altitude clouds with low partial pressures of water vapor have smaller emissivities for thermal radiation and larger albedos than otherwise identical but warmer low-altitude clouds with higher partial pressures of water vapor. In $2n$-stream scattering theory, these phenomena can be quantified with the intensity emissivities $\varepsilon_{i}$ of the streams $i=1,2,3,\ldots, 2n$, and with upward or downward flux emissivities, $\varepsilon_{\bf u}$ and $\varepsilon_{\bf d}$. The emissivities are the ratios of the outgoing thermal intensities or fluxes to those of a reference black cloud. Emission from optically-thick, isothermal clouds with scattering, as well as absorption and emission, is limb darkened. Intensity emissivities $\varepsilon_i$ for streams that are nearly normal to the cloud surface are larger than those of more nearly horizontal streams. The limb darkening increases with increasing values of the single scattering albedo $\tilde ω$. For fixed values of $\tildeω$, the onset of limb darkening with increasing zenith angle is more abrupt for phase functions with more forward scattering. Black clouds, which have only absorption and emission but no scattering, have unit (Lambertian) emissivities, $\varepsilon_i = 1$, for all stream directions.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.