Paper detail

Dynamical prediction of two meteorological factors using the deep neural network and the long short-term memory $(2)$

This paper presents the predictive accuracy using two-variate meteorological factors, average temperature and average humidity, in neural network algorithms. We analyze result in five learning architectures such as the traditional artificial neural network, deep neural network, and extreme learning machine, long short-term memory, and long-short-term memory with peephole connections, after manipulating the computer-simulation. Our neural network modes are trained on the daily time-series dataset during seven years (from 2014 to 2020). From the trained results for 2500, 5000, and 7500 epochs, we obtain the predicted accuracies of the meteorological factors produced from outputs in ten metropolitan cities (Seoul, Daejeon, Daegu, Busan, Incheon, Gwangju, Pohang, Mokpo, Tongyeong, and Jeonju). The error statistics is found from the result of outputs, and we compare these values to each other after the manipulation of five neural networks. As using the long-short-term memory model in testing 1 (the average temperature predicted from the input layer with six input nodes), Tonyeong has the lowest root mean squared error (RMSE) value of 0.866 $(%)$ in summer from the computer-simulation in order to predict the temperature. To predict the humidity, the RMSE is shown the lowest value of 5.732 $(%)$, when using the long short-term memory model in summer in Mokpo in testing 2 (the average humidity predicted from the input layer with six input nodes). Particularly, the long short-term memory model is is found to be more accurate in forecasting daily levels than other neural network models in temperature and humidity forecastings. Our result may provide a computer-simuation basis for the necessity of exploring and develping a novel neural network evaluation method in the future.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.