Paper detail

Dosimetric characterization of a new 192Ir pulse dose rate brachytherapy source with the Monte Carlo simulation and thermoluminescent dosimeter

In this study, recommendations of the AAPM TG- 43 (U1) report have been followed to characterize the new 192Ir pulse dose rate source, provided by the Applied Radiation Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute in Iran. Dose rate constant, radial dose function, geometry factors, and anisotropy function were calculated according to the relevant American Association of Physicists in Medicine AAPM and TG43 (U1) reports. In this study, 192Ir source was characterized using Monte Carlo simulation in water phantom, and in addition, experimental measurements were carried out using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100) in plexiglass (PMMA) phantoms. The dose-rate constant for the 192Ir PDR was found to be equal to 1.131 cGyh-1U-1 and 1.173 cGyh-1U-1 with TLD measurement and Monte Carlo simulation, respectively. Also in this study, the geometry function, radial dose functions g(r), and the anisotropy function have been calculated at distances from 0.1 to 16 cm. The dose-rate constant of these calculations has been compared with measured values for an actual 192Ir seed. The results of dosimetry parameters, presented in tabulated and graphical formats, exhibited good agreement to those reported from other commercially available PDR 192Ir sources. The results obtained in this study are in close agreement with the characteristics of the commercially available 192Ir sources. The results obtained in this study can be treated as an initial assessment of this source to be employed in the conventional treatment planning systems subsequent to complementary investigations.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.