Paper detail

Distributed Self-Stabilizing MIS with Few States and Weak Communication

We study a simple random process that computes a maximal independent set (MIS) on a general $n$-vertex graph. Each vertex has a binary state, black or white, where black indicates inclusion into the MIS. The vertex states are arbitrary initially, and are updated in parallel: In each round, every vertex whose state is ``inconsistent'' with its neighbors', i.e., it is black and has a black neighbor, or it is white and all neighbors are white, changes its state with probability $1/2$. The process stabilizes with probability 1 on any graph, and the resulting set of black vertices is an MIS. It is also easy to see that the expected stabilization time is $O(\log n)$ on certain graph families, such as cliques and trees. However, analyzing the process on graphs beyond these simple cases seems challenging. Our main result is that the process stabilizes in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ rounds w.h.p.\ on $G_{n,p}$ random graphs, for $0\leq p \leq \mathrm{poly}(\log n)\cdot n^{-1/2}$ and $p \geq 1/\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$. Further, an extension of this process, with larger but still constant vertex state space, stabilizes in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ rounds on $G_{n,p}$ w.h.p., for all $1\leq p\leq 1$. We conjecture that this improved bound holds for the original process as well. In fact, we believe that the original process stabilizes in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ rounds on any given $n$-vertex graph w.h.p. Both processes readily translate into distributed/parallel MIS algorithms, which are self-stabilizing, use constant space (and constant random bits per round), and assume restricted communication as in the beeping or the synchronous stone age models. To the best of our knowledge, no previously known MIS algorithm is self-stabilizing, uses constant space and constant randomness, and stabilizes in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ rounds in general or random graphs.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.