Source author record

George Giakkoupis

George Giakkoupis appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Distributed Self-Stabilizing MIS with Few States and Weak Communication

We study a simple random process that computes a maximal independent set (MIS) on a general $n$-vertex graph. Each vertex has a binary state, black or white, where black indicates inclusion into the MIS. The vertex states are arbitrary initially, and are updated in parallel: In each round, every vertex whose state is ``inconsistent'' with its neighbors', i.e., it is black and has a black neighbor, or it is white and all neighbors are white, changes its state with probability $1/2$. The process stabilizes with probability 1 on any graph, and the resulting set of black vertices is an MIS. It is also easy to see that the expected stabilization time is $O(\log n)$ on certain graph families, such as cliques and trees. However, analyzing the process on graphs beyond these simple cases seems challenging. Our main result is that the process stabilizes in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ rounds w.h.p.\ on $G_{n,p}$ random graphs, for $0\leq p \leq \mathrm{poly}(\log n)\cdot n^{-1/2}$ and $p \geq 1/\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$. Further, an extension of this process, with larger but still constant vertex state space, stabilizes in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ rounds on $G_{n,p}$ w.h.p., for all $1\leq p\leq 1$. We conjecture that this improved bound holds for the original process as well. In fact, we believe that the original process stabilizes in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ rounds on any given $n$-vertex graph w.h.p. Both processes readily translate into distributed/parallel MIS algorithms, which are self-stabilizing, use constant space (and constant random bits per round), and assume restricted communication as in the beeping or the synchronous stone age models. To the best of our knowledge, no previously known MIS algorithm is self-stabilizing, uses constant space and constant randomness, and stabilizes in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ rounds in general or random graphs.

preprint2020arXiv

How to Spread a Rumor: Call Your Neighbors or Take a Walk?

We study the problem of randomized information dissemination in networks. We compare the now standard PUSH-PULL protocol, with agent-based alternatives where information is disseminated by a collection of agents performing independent random walks. In the VISIT-EXCHANGE protocol, both nodes and agents store information, and each time an agent visits a node, the two exchange all the information they have. In the MEET-EXCHANGE protocol, only the agents store information, and exchange their information with each agent they meet. We consider the broadcast time of a single piece of information in an $n$-node graph for the above three protocols, assuming a linear number of agents that start from the stationary distribution. We observe that there are graphs on which the agent-based protocols are significantly faster than PUSH-PULL, and graphs where the converse is true. We attribute the good performance of agent-based algorithms to their inherently fair bandwidth utilization, and conclude that, in certain settings, agent-based information dissemination, separately or in combination with PUSH-PULL, can significantly improve the broadcast time. The graphs considered above are highly non-regular. Our main technical result is that on any regular graph of at least logarithmic degree, PUSH-PULL and VISIT-EXCHANGE have the same asymptotic broadcast time. The proof uses a novel coupling argument which relates the random choices of vertices in PUSH-PULL with the random walks in VISIT-EXCHANGE. Further, we show that the broadcast time of MEET-EXCHANGE is asymptotically at least as large as the other two's on all regular graphs, and strictly larger on some regular graphs. As far as we know, this is the first systematic and thorough comparison of the running times of these very natural information dissemination protocols.

preprint2016arXiv

Amplifiers and Suppressors of Selection for the Moran Process on Undirected Graphs

We consider the classic Moran process modeling the spread of genetic mutations, as extended to structured populations by Lieberman et al.\ (Nature, 2005). In this process, individuals are the vertices of a connected graph $G$. Initially, there is a single mutant vertex, chosen uniformly at random. In each step, a random vertex is selected for reproduction with a probability proportional to its fitness: mutants have fitness $r>1$, while non-mutants have fitness 1. The vertex chosen to reproduce places a copy of itself to a uniformly random neighbor in $G$, replacing the individual that was there. The process ends when the mutation either reaches fixation (i.e., all vertices are mutants), or gets extinct. The principal quantity of interest is the probability with which each of the two outcomes occurs. A problem that has received significant attention recently concerns the existence of families of graphs, called strong amplifiers of selection, for which the fixation probability tends to 1 as the order $n$ of the graph increases, and the existence of strong suppressors of selection, for which this probability tends to 0. For the case of directed graphs, it is known that both strong amplifiers and suppressors exist. For the case of undirected graphs, however, the problem has remained open, and the general belief has been that neither strong amplifiers nor suppressors exist. In this paper we disprove this belief, by providing the first examples of such graphs. The strong amplifier we present has fixation probability $1-\tilde O(n^{-1/3})$, and the strong suppressor has fixation probability $\tilde O(n^{-1/4})$. Both graph constructions are surprisingly simple. We also prove a general upper bound of $1-\tilde Ω(n^{-1/3})$ on the fixation probability of any undirected graph. Hence, our strong amplifier is existentially optimal.

preprint2016arXiv

Bounds on the Voter Model in Dynamic Networks

In the voter model, each node of a graph has an opinion, and in every round each node chooses independently a random neighbour and adopts its opinion. We are interested in the consensus time, which is the first point in time where all nodes have the same opinion. We consider dynamic graphs in which the edges are rewired in every round (by an adversary) giving rise to the graph sequence $G_1, G_2, \dots $, where we assume that $G_i$ has conductance at least $ϕ_i$. We assume that the degrees of nodes don't change over time as one can show that the consensus time can become super-exponential otherwise. In the case of a sequence of $d$-regular graphs, we obtain asymptotically tight results. Even for some static graphs, such as the cycle, our results improve the state of the art. Here we show that the expected number of rounds until all nodes have the same opinion is bounded by $O(m/(d_{min} \cdot ϕ))$, for any graph with $m$ edges, conductance $ϕ$, and degrees at least $d_{min}$. In addition, we consider a biased dynamic voter model, where each opinion $i$ is associated with a probability $P_i$, and when a node chooses a neighbour with that opinion, it adopts opinion $i$ with probability $P_i$ (otherwise the node keeps its current opinion). We show for any regular dynamic graph, that if there is an $ε>0$ difference between the highest and second highest opinion probabilities, and at least $Ω(\log n)$ nodes have initially the opinion with the highest probability, then all nodes adopt w.h.p. that opinion. We obtain a bound on the convergences time, which becomes $O(\log n/ϕ)$ for static graphs.

preprint2016arXiv

Deterministic and Fast Randomized Test-and-Set in Optimal Space

The test-and-set object is a fundamental synchronization primitive for shared memory systems. A test-and-set object stores a bit, initialized to 0, and supports one operation, test&set(), which sets the bit's value to 1 and returns its previous value. This paper studies the number of atomic registers required to implement a test-and-set object in the standard asynchronous shared memory model with n processes. The best lower bound is log(n)-1 for obstruction-free (Giakkoupis and Woelfel, 2012) and deadlock-free (Styer and Peterson, 1989) implementations. Recently a deterministic obstruction-free implementation using O(sqrt(n)) registers was presented (Giakkoupis, Helmi, Higham, and Woelfel, 2013). This paper closes the gap between these known upper and lower bounds by presenting a deterministic obstruction-free implementation of a test-and-set object from Theta(log n) registers of size Theta(log n) bits. We also provide a technique to transform any deterministic obstruction-free algorithm, in which, from any configuration, any process can finish if it runs for b steps without interference, into a randomized wait-free algorithm for the oblivious adversary, in which the expected step complexity is polynomial in n and b. This transformation allows us to combine our obstruction-free algorithm with the randomized test-and-set algorithm by Giakkoupis and Woelfel (2012), to obtain a randomized wait-free test-and-set algorithm from Theta(log n) registers, with expected step-complexity Theta(log* n) against the oblivious adversary.

preprint2013arXiv

Tight Bounds for Rumor Spreading with Vertex Expansion

We establish a bound for the classic PUSH-PULL rumor spreading protocol on arbitrary graphs, in terms of the vertex expansion of the graph. We show that O(log^2(n)/α) rounds suffice with high probability to spread a rumor from a single node to all n nodes, in any graph with vertex expansion at least α. This bound matches the known lower bound, and settles the question on the relationship between rumor spreading and vertex expansion asked by Chierichetti, Lattanzi, and Panconesi (SODA 2010). Further, some of the arguments used in the proof may be of independent interest, as they give new insights, for example, on how to choose a small set of nodes in which to plant the rumor initially, to guarantee fast rumor spreading.