Paper detail

Discriminating quantum states: the multiple Chernoff distance

We consider the problem of testing multiple quantum hypotheses $\{ρ_1^{\otimes n},\ldots,ρ_r^{\otimes n}\}$, where an arbitrary prior distribution is given and each of the $r$ hypotheses is $n$ copies of a quantum state. It is known that the average error probability $P_e$ decays exponentially to zero, that is, $P_e=\exp\{-ξn+o(n)\}$. However, this error exponent $ξ$ is generally unknown, except for the case that $r=2$. In this paper, we solve the long-standing open problem of identifying the above error exponent, by proving Nussbaum and Szkoła's conjecture that $ξ=\min_{i\neq j}C(ρ_i,ρ_j)$. The right-hand side of this equality is called the multiple quantum Chernoff distance, and $C(ρ_i,ρ_j):=\max_{0\leq s\leq 1}\{-\log\operatorname{Tr}ρ_i^sρ_j^{1-s}\}$ has been previously identified as the optimal error exponent for testing two hypotheses, $ρ_i^{\otimes n}$ versus $ρ_j^{\otimes n}$. The main ingredient of our proof is a new upper bound for the average error probability, for testing an ensemble of finite-dimensional, but otherwise general, quantum states. This upper bound, up to a states-dependent factor, matches the multiple-state generalization of Nussbaum and Szkoła's lower bound. Specialized to the case $r=2$, we give an alternative proof to the achievability of the binary-hypothesis Chernoff distance, which was originally proved by Audenaert et al.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author7 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.