Paper detail

Discretizing $L_p$ norms and frame theory

Given an $N$-dimensional subspace $X$ of $L_p([0,1])$, we consider the problem of choosing $M$-sampling points which may be used to discretely approximate the $L_p$ norm on the subspace. We are particularly interested in knowing when the number of sampling points $M$ can be chosen on the order of the dimension $N$. For the case $p=2$ it is known that $M$ may always be chosen on the order of $N$ as long as the subspace $X$ satisfies a natural $L_\infty$ bound, and for the case $p=\infty$ there are examples where $M$ may not be chosen on the order of $N$. We show for all $1\leq p<2$ that there exist classes of subspaces of $L_p([0,1])$ which satisfy the $L_\infty$ bound, but where the number of sampling points $M$ cannot be chosen on the order of $N$. We show as well that the problem of discretizing the $L_p$ norm of subspaces is directly connected with frame theory. In particular, we prove that discretizing a continuous frame to obtain a discrete frame which does stable phase retrieval requires discretizing both the $L_2$ norm and the $L_1$ norm on the range of the analysis operator of the continuous frame.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.