Source author record

Dorsa Ghoreishi

Dorsa Ghoreishi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Discretizing $L_p$ norms and frame theory

Given an $N$-dimensional subspace $X$ of $L_p([0,1])$, we consider the problem of choosing $M$-sampling points which may be used to discretely approximate the $L_p$ norm on the subspace. We are particularly interested in knowing when the number of sampling points $M$ can be chosen on the order of the dimension $N$. For the case $p=2$ it is known that $M$ may always be chosen on the order of $N$ as long as the subspace $X$ satisfies a natural $L_\infty$ bound, and for the case $p=\infty$ there are examples where $M$ may not be chosen on the order of $N$. We show for all $1\leq p<2$ that there exist classes of subspaces of $L_p([0,1])$ which satisfy the $L_\infty$ bound, but where the number of sampling points $M$ cannot be chosen on the order of $N$. We show as well that the problem of discretizing the $L_p$ norm of subspaces is directly connected with frame theory. In particular, we prove that discretizing a continuous frame to obtain a discrete frame which does stable phase retrieval requires discretizing both the $L_2$ norm and the $L_1$ norm on the range of the analysis operator of the continuous frame.

preprint2016arXiv

Weak phase retrieval and phaseless reconstruction

Phase retrieval and phaseless reconstruction for Hilbert space frames is a very active area of research. Recently, it was shown that these concepts are equivalent. In this paper, we make a detailed study of a weakening of these concepts to weak phase retrieval and weak phaseless reconstruction. We will give several necessary and/or sufficient conditions for frames to have these weak properties. We will prove three surprising results: (1) Weak phaseless reconstruction is equivalent to phaseless reconstruction. I.e. It never was "weak"; (2) Weak phase retrieval is not equivalent to weak phaseless reconstruction; (3) Weak phase retrieval requires at least $2m-2$ vectors in an m-dimensional Hilbert space. We also gives several examples illustrating the relationship between these concepts.