Paper detail

Digital Twins in the Cloud: A Modular, Scalable and Interoperable Framework for Accelerating Verification and Validation of Autonomous Driving Solutions

Verification and validation (V&V) of autonomous vehicles (AVs) typically requires exhaustive testing across a variety of operating environments and driving scenarios including rare, extreme, or hazardous situations that might be difficult or impossible to capture in reality. Additionally, physical V&V methods such as track-based evaluations or public-road testing are often constrained by time, cost, and safety, which motivates the need for virtual proving grounds. However, the fidelity and scalability of simulation-based V&V methods can quickly turn into a bottleneck. In such a milieu, this work proposes a virtual proving ground that flexibly scales digital twins within high-performance computing clusters (HPCCs) and automates the V&V process. Here, digital twins enable high-fidelity virtual representation of the AV and its operating environments, allowing extensive scenario-based testing. Meanwhile, HPCC infrastructure brings substantial advantages in terms of computational power and scalability, enabling rapid iterations of simulations, processing and storage of massive amounts of data, and deployment of large-scale test campaigns, thereby reducing the time and cost associated with the V&V process. We demonstrate the efficacy of this approach through a case study that focuses on the variability analysis of a candidate autonomy algorithm to identify potential vulnerabilities in its perception, planning, and control sub-systems. The modularity, scalability, and interoperability of the proposed framework are demonstrated by deploying a test campaign comprising 256 test cases on two different HPCC architectures to ensure continuous operation in a publicly shared resource setting. The findings highlight the ability of the proposed framework to accelerate and streamline the V&V process, thereby significantly compressing (~30x) the timeline.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.