Paper detail

Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood for $p/n \to κ\in (0,1)$ logistic regression

We characterise the behavior of the maximum Diaconis--Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood estimator in high-dimensional logistic regression, where the number of covariates is a fraction $κ\in (0,1)$ of the number of observations $n$, as $n \to \infty$. We construct a rescaled estimator with zero asymptotic aggregate bias and define adjusted $Z$-statistics and rescaled penalized likelihood ratio statistics that exhibit the typical null asymptotic distributions, when the covariates are independent multivariate normal with an arbitrary covariance matrix and the linear predictor has asymptotic variance $γ^2$. While the maximum likelihood estimate asymptotically exists only for a narrow range of $(κ, γ)$ values, the maximum Diaconis--Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood estimate always exists and can be computed directly using standard maximum likelihood routines. Thus, our asymptotic results extend to $(κ, γ)$ values where the maximum likelihood framework breaks down, with no additional implementation or computational cost. We study the estimator's shrinkage properties, compare the proposed estimation and inference procedures with alternatives that also accommodate proportional asymptotics, and formulate a conjecture -- supported by strong empirical evidence -- that extends our results when the model includes an intercept parameter. Finally, we propose estimation methods for all unknown constants involved in our procedures and demonstrate the theoretical advances through extensive simulation studies and the analysis of digit recognition data.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.