BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ioannis Kosmidis

Ioannis Kosmidis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodologymath.STStatistics TheoryApplicationsComputation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood for $p/n \to κ\in (0,1)$ logistic regression

We characterise the behavior of the maximum Diaconis--Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood estimator in high-dimensional logistic regression, where the number of covariates is a fraction $κ\in (0,1)$ of the number of observations $n$, as $n \to \infty$. We construct a rescaled estimator with zero asymptotic aggregate bias and define adjusted $Z$-statistics and rescaled penalized likelihood ratio statistics that exhibit the typical null asymptotic distributions, when the covariates are independent multivariate normal with an arbitrary covariance matrix and the linear predictor has asymptotic variance $γ^2$. While the maximum likelihood estimate asymptotically exists only for a narrow range of $(κ, γ)$ values, the maximum Diaconis--Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood estimate always exists and can be computed directly using standard maximum likelihood routines. Thus, our asymptotic results extend to $(κ, γ)$ values where the maximum likelihood framework breaks down, with no additional implementation or computational cost. We study the estimator's shrinkage properties, compare the proposed estimation and inference procedures with alternatives that also accommodate proportional asymptotics, and formulate a conjecture -- supported by strong empirical evidence -- that extends our results when the model includes an intercept parameter. Finally, we propose estimation methods for all unknown constants involved in our procedures and demonstrate the theoretical advances through extensive simulation studies and the analysis of digit recognition data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Mean and median bias reduction: A concise review and application to adjacent-categories logit models

The estimation of categorical response models using bias-reducing adjusted score equations has seen extensive theoretical research and applied use. The resulting estimates have been found to have superior frequentist properties to what maximum likelihood generally delivers and to be finite, even in cases where the maximum likelihood estimates are infinite. We briefly review mean and median bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates via adjusted score equations in an illustration-driven way, and discuss their particular equivariance properties under parameter transformations. We then apply mean and median bias reduction to adjacent-categories logit models for ordinal responses. We show how ready bias reduction procedures for Poisson log-linear models can be used for mean and median bias reduction in adjacent-categories logit models with proportional odds and mean bias-reduced estimation in models with non-proportional odds. As in binomial logistic regression, the reduced-bias estimates are found to be finite even in cases where the maximum likelihood estimates are infinite. We also use the approximation of the bias of transformations of mean bias-reduced estimators to correct for the mean bias of model-based ordinal superiority measures. All developments are motivated and illustrated using real-data case studies and simulations

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Parametric bootstrap inference for stratified models with high-dimensional nuisance specifications

Inference about a scalar parameter of interest typically relies on the asymptotic normality of common likelihood pivots, such as the signed likelihood root, the score and Wald statistics. Nevertheless, the resulting inferential procedures are known to perform poorly when the dimension of the nuisance parameter is large relative to the sample size and when the information about the parameters is limited. In many such cases, the use of asymptotic normality of analytical modifications of the signed likelihood root is known to recover inferential performance. It is proved here that parametric bootstrap of standard likelihood pivots results in as accurate inferences as analytical modifications of the signed likelihood root do in stratified models with stratum specific nuisance parameters. We focus on the challenging case where the number of strata increases as fast or faster than the stratum samples size. It is also shown that this equivalence holds regardless of whether constrained or unconstrained bootstrap is used. This is in contrast to when the number of strata is fixed or increases slower than the stratum sample size, where we show that constrained bootstrap corrects inference to a higher order than unconstrained bootstrap. Simulation experiments support the theoretical findings and demonstrate the excellent performance of bootstrap in extreme scenarios.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Bias Reduction as a Remedy to the Consequences of Infinite Estimates in Poisson and Tobit Regression

Data separation is a well-studied phenomenon that can cause problems in the estimation and inference from binary response models. Complete or quasi-complete separation occurs when there is a combination of regressors in the model whose value can perfectly predict one or both outcomes. In such cases, and such cases only, the maximum likelihood estimates and the corresponding standard errors are infinite. It is less widely known that the same can happen in further microeconometric models. One of the few works in the area is Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2010) who note that the finiteness of the maximum likelihood estimates in Poisson regression depends on the data configuration and propose a strategy to detect and overcome the consequences of data separation. However, their approach can lead to notable bias on the parameter estimates when the regressors are correlated. We illustrate how bias-reducing adjustments to the maximum likelihood score equations can overcome the consequences of separation in Poisson and Tobit regression models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Bayesian inference approach for determining player abilities in football

We consider the task of determining a football player's ability for a given event type, for example, scoring a goal. We propose an interpretable Bayesian model which is fit using variational inference methods. We implement a Poisson model to capture occurrences of event types, from which we infer player abilities. Our approach also allows the visualisation of differences between players, for a specific ability, through the marginal posterior variational densities. We then use these inferred player abilities to extend the Bayesian hierarchical model of Baio and Blangiardo (2010) which captures a team's scoring rate (the rate at which they score goals). We apply the resulting scheme to the English Premier League, capturing player abilities over the 2013/2014 season, before using output from the hierarchical model to predict whether over or under 2.5 goals will be scored in a given game in the 2014/2015 season. This validates our model as a way of providing insights into team formation and the individual success of sports teams.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Jeffreys-prior penalty, finiteness and shrinkage in binomial-response generalized linear models

Penalization of the likelihood by Jeffreys' invariant prior, or by a positive power thereof, is shown to produce finite-valued maximum penalized likelihood estimates in a broad class of binomial generalized linear models. The class of models includes logistic regression, where the Jeffreys-prior penalty is known additionally to reduce the asymptotic bias of the maximum likelihood estimator; and also models with other commonly used link functions such as probit and log-log. Shrinkage towards equiprobability across observations, relative to the maximum likelihood estimator, is established theoretically and is studied through illustrative examples. Some implications of finiteness and shrinkage for inference are discussed, particularly when inference is based on Wald-type procedures. A widely applicable procedure is developed for computation of maximum penalized likelihood estimates, by using repeated maximum likelihood fits with iteratively adjusted binomial responses and totals. These theoretical results and methods underpin the increasingly widespread use of reduced-bias and similarly penalized binomial regression models in many applied fields.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access