Paper detail

Determination of the optimal shell thickness for self-catalysed GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires

We present a set of experimental results identifying various effects that govern the carrier dynamics of self-catalyzed GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires (NWs) grown by molecular beam epitaxy i.e. surface recombination velocity, surface charge traps, and structural defects. Time-resolved photoluminescence of NW ensemble and spatially-resolved cathodoluminescence of single NWs reveal that emission intensity, decay time and carrier diffusion length of the GaAs NW cores strongly depend on AlGaAs shell thickness but in a non-monotonic fashion. Although 7 nm-AlGaAs shell can efficiently suppress the surface recombination velocity of the GaAs NW cores, the effect of the band bending caused by the surface charges remains dominant if the shell thickness is less than 50 nm; that is, the carrier diffusion length is smaller in the NWs with a thinner shell caused by a stronger carrier scattering at the core/shell interface. If the AlGaAs shell thickness is larger than 50 nm, the luminescence efficiency of the GaAs NW cores starts to be deteriorated, ascribed to the defect formation inside the AlGaAs shell evidenced by transmission electron microscopy.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.