Paper detail

Determination of symmetry energy from experimental and observational constraints; prediction on CREX

Taking $r_{\rm skin}^{208}({\rm PREX})=0.33^{+0.16}_{-0.18}~{\rm fm}$ as an experimental constraint and $M_{\rm max}^{\rm NS} \ge 2{\rm M}_{\rm sun}$ as an observational (astrophysical) constraint, we determine an indisputable range for $J$, $L$, $K_{\rm sym}$ defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq-S-sym}. For this purpose, we take a statistical approach. We first accumulate the 206 EoS data from theoretical works and take correlation between $r_{\rm skin}^{208}$ and $L$ for the 206 EoSs, where 7 Gogny EoSs are obtained by our calculations. Since the correlation coefficient is $R = 0.99$, we can regard $L$ as a function of $r_{\rm skin}^{208}$, so that we succeed in deducing an empirical constraint $L=31-161$~MeV from $r_{\rm skin}^{208}({\rm PREX})=0.15-0.49$~fm. For the 47 EoSs satisfying the observational constraint, 46 EoSs satisfy the empirical constraint. The 46 EoSs yield $J=29-44$~MeV, $L= 37-135$~MeV, $K_{\rm sym}=(-137)-(160)$~MeV. The is a primary result. When we take correlation between $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$ and $r_{\rm skin}^{208}$ for the 206 EoSs, $R$ is 0.99. The $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$--$r_{\rm skin}^{208}$ relation allows us to transform $r_{\rm skin}^{208}({\rm PREX})$ into the corresponding data on $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$ In order to estimate a value of $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$ for ongoing CREX, we take the weighted mean and its error of two present data on $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$ and transformed PREX value on $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$. The weighted mean is $r_{\rm skin}^{48}=0.17$~fm. This is a prediction for the central value of CREX.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.