Researcher profile

Shingo Tagami

Shingo Tagami contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Determination of symmetry energy from experimental and observational constraints; prediction on CREX

Taking $r_{\rm skin}^{208}({\rm PREX})=0.33^{+0.16}_{-0.18}~{\rm fm}$ as an experimental constraint and $M_{\rm max}^{\rm NS} \ge 2{\rm M}_{\rm sun}$ as an observational (astrophysical) constraint, we determine an indisputable range for $J$, $L$, $K_{\rm sym}$ defined in Eq.~\eqref{eq-S-sym}. For this purpose, we take a statistical approach. We first accumulate the 206 EoS data from theoretical works and take correlation between $r_{\rm skin}^{208}$ and $L$ for the 206 EoSs, where 7 Gogny EoSs are obtained by our calculations. Since the correlation coefficient is $R = 0.99$, we can regard $L$ as a function of $r_{\rm skin}^{208}$, so that we succeed in deducing an empirical constraint $L=31-161$~MeV from $r_{\rm skin}^{208}({\rm PREX})=0.15-0.49$~fm. For the 47 EoSs satisfying the observational constraint, 46 EoSs satisfy the empirical constraint. The 46 EoSs yield $J=29-44$~MeV, $L= 37-135$~MeV, $K_{\rm sym}=(-137)-(160)$~MeV. The is a primary result. When we take correlation between $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$ and $r_{\rm skin}^{208}$ for the 206 EoSs, $R$ is 0.99. The $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$--$r_{\rm skin}^{208}$ relation allows us to transform $r_{\rm skin}^{208}({\rm PREX})$ into the corresponding data on $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$ In order to estimate a value of $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$ for ongoing CREX, we take the weighted mean and its error of two present data on $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$ and transformed PREX value on $r_{\rm skin}^{48}$. The weighted mean is $r_{\rm skin}^{48}=0.17$~fm. This is a prediction for the central value of CREX.

preprint2020arXiv

$g$-matrix folding-model approach to reaction cross sections for scattering of Ca isotopes on a C target

We first predict the ground-state properties of Ca isotopes, using the Gogny-D1S Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (GHFB) with and without the angular momentum projection (AMP). We find that $^{64}$Ca is an even-dripline nucleus and $^{59}$Ca is an odd-dripline nucleus, using $A$ dependence of the one-neutron separation energy $S_{1}$ and the two-neutron separation energy, $S_{2}$. As for $S_{1}$, $S_{2}$ and the binding energies $E_{\rm B}$, our results agree with the experimental data in $^{40-58}$Ca. As other ground-state properties of $^{40-60,62,64}$Ca, we predict charge, proton, neutron, matter radii, neutron skin and deformation. As for charge radii, our results are consistent with the experimental data in $^{40-52}$Ca. For $^{48}$Ca, our results on proton, neutron, matter radii agree with the experimental data. Very lately, Tanaka et. al. measured interaction cross sections for $^{42-51}$Ca scattering on a $^{12}$C target at an incident energy per nucleon of $E_{\rm lab}=280$MeV. Secondly, we predict reaction cross sections $σ_{\rm R}$ for $^{40-60,62,64}$Ca, using a chiral $g$-matrix double-folding model (DFM). To show the reliability of the present DFM for $σ_{\rm R}$, we apply the DFM for the data on $^{12}$C scattering on $^{9}$Be, $^{12}$C, $^{27}$Al targets in $30 < E_{\rm lab} < 400 $MeV, and show that the present DFM is good in $30 < E_{\rm lab} < 100 $MeV and $250 < E_{\rm lab} < 400 $MeV. For $110 < E_{\rm lab} < 240 $MeV, our results have small errors. To improve the present DFM for $σ_{\rm R}$, we propose two prescriptions.