Paper detail

Determination of mass hierarchy with medium baseline reactor neutrino experiments

We study the sensitivity of future medium baseline reactor antineutrino experiments on the neutrino mass hierarchy. By using the standard chi^2 analysis, we find that the sensitivity depends strongly on the baseline length L and the energy resolution (delta E/E)^2 = (a/sqrt{E/MeV})^2 + b^2, where a and b parameterize the statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The optimal length is found to be L ~ 40-55 km, where a slightly shorter L in the range is preferred for poorer energy resolution. The running time needed to determine the mass hierarchy also depends strongly on the energy resolution; for a 5 kton detector (with 12% weight fraction of free proton) placed at L ~ 50 km away from a 20 GW_{th} reactor, three-sigma determination needs 14 years of running with a = 3% and b = 0.5%, which can be reduced to 5 years if a = 2% and b = 0.5%. On the other hand, the experiment can measure the mixing parameters accurately, achieving delta sin^2(2theta_{12}) ~ 4*10^{-3}, delta (m_2^2-m_1^2) ~ 0.03*10^{-5} eV^2, and delta |m_3^2 -m_1^2| ~ 0.007*10^{-3} eV^2, in 5 years, almost independently of the energy resolution for a < 3% and b < 1%. In order to compare our simple (Delta chi^2)_{min} results with those obtained by simulating many experiments, we develop an efficient method to estimate the uncertainty of (Delta chi^2)_{min}, and the probability for determining the right mass hierarchy by an experiment is presented as a function of the mean (Delta chi^2)_{min}.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.