Paper detail

Demonstration of a novel technique to measure two-photon exchange effects in elastic $e^\pm p$ scattering

The discrepancy between proton electromagnetic form factors extracted using unpolarized and polarized scattering data is believed to be a consequence of two-photon exchange (TPE) effects. However, the calculations of TPE corrections have significant model dependence, and there is limited direct experimental evidence for such corrections. We present the results of a new experimental technique for making direct $e^\pm p$ comparisons, which has the potential to make precise measurements over a broad range in $Q^2$ and scattering angles. We use the Jefferson Lab electron beam and the Hall B photon tagger to generate a clean but untagged photon beam. The photon beam impinges on a converter foil to generate a mixed beam of electrons, positrons, and photons. A chicane is used to separate and recombine the electron and positron beams while the photon beam is stopped by a photon blocker. This provides a combined electron and positron beam, with energies from 0.5 to 3.2 GeV, which impinges on a liquid hydrogen target. The large acceptance CLAS detector is used to identify and reconstruct elastic scattering events, determining both the initial lepton energy and the sign of the scattered lepton. The data were collected in two days with a primary electron beam energy of only 3.3 GeV, limiting the data from this run to smaller values of $Q^2$ and scattering angle. Nonetheless, this measurement yields a data sample for $e^\pm p$ with statistics comparable to those of the best previous measurements. We have shown that we can cleanly identify elastic scattering events and correct for the difference in acceptance for electron and positron scattering. The final ratio of positron to electron scattering: $R=1.027\pm0.005\pm0.05$ for $<Q^2>=0.206$ GeV$^2$ and $0.830\leq ε\leq 0.943$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
M. MoteabbedM. NiroulaB. A. RaueL. B. WeinsteinD. AdikaramJ. ArringtonW. K. BrooksJ. LachnietDipak RimalM. UngaroK. P. AdhikariM. AghasyanM. J. AmaryanS. Anefalos PereiraH. AvakianJ. BallN. A. BaltzellM. BattaglieriV. BatourineI. BedlinskiyR. P. BennettA. S. BiselliJ. BonoS. BoiarinovW. J. BriscoeV. D. BurkertD. S. CarmanA. CelentanoS. ChandavarP. L. ColeP. CollinsM. ContalbrigoO. CortesV. CredeA. D&#39;AngeloN. DashyanR. De VitaE. De SanctisA. DeurC. DjalaliD. DoughtyR. DupreH. EgiyanL. El FassiP. EugenioG. FedotovS. FeganR. FerschJ. A. FlemingN. GevorgyanG. P. GilfoyleK. L. GiovanettiF. X. GirodJ. T. GoetzW. GohnE. GolovatchR. W. GotheK. A. GriffioenM. GuidalN. GulerL. GuoK. HafidiH. HakobyanC. HanrettyN. HarrisonD. HeddleK. HicksD. HoM. HoltropC. E. HydeY. IlievaD. G. IrelandB. S. IshkhanovE. L. IsupovH. S. JoK. JooD. KellerM. KhandakerA. KimF. J. KleinS. KoiralaA. KubarovskyV. KubarovskyS. E. KuhnS. V. KuleshovS. LewisH. Y. LuM. MacCormickI . J . D. MacGregorD. MartinezM. MayerB. McKinnonT. MineevaM. MirazitaV. MokeevR. A. MontgomeryK. MoriyaH. MoutardeE. MunevarC. Munoz CamachoP. Nadel-TuronskiR. NasseripourS. NiccolaiG. NiculescuI. NiculescuM. OsipenkoA. I. OstrovidovL. L. PappalardoR. ParemuzyanK. ParkS. ParkE. PhelpsJ. J. PhillipsS. PisanoO. PogorelkoS. PozdniakovJ. W. PriceS. ProcureurD. ProtopopescuA. J. R. PuckettM. RipaniG. RosnerP. RossiF. SabatiéM. S. SainiC. SalgadoD. SchottR. A. SchumacherE. SederH. SeraydaryanY. G. SharabianE. S. SmithG. D. SmithD. I. SoberD. SokhanS. StepanyanS. StrauchW. TangC. E. TaylorYe TianS. TkachenkoH. VoskanyanE. VoutierN. K. WalfordM. H. WoodN. ZachariouL. ZanaJ. ZhangZ. W. ZhaoI. Zonta

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access150 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

M. MoteabbedM. NiroulaB. A. RaueL. B. WeinsteinD. AdikaramJ. ArringtonW. K. BrooksJ. LachnietDipak RimalM. UngaroK. P. AdhikariM. AghasyanM. J. AmaryanS. Anefalos PereiraH. AvakianJ. BallN. A. BaltzellM. BattaglieriV. BatourineI. BedlinskiyR. P. BennettA. S. BiselliJ. BonoS. BoiarinovW. J. BriscoeV. D. BurkertD. S. CarmanA. CelentanoS. ChandavarP. L. ColeP. CollinsM. ContalbrigoO. CortesV. CredeA. D&#39;AngeloN. DashyanR. De VitaE. De SanctisA. DeurC. DjalaliD. DoughtyR. DupreH. EgiyanL. El FassiP. EugenioG. FedotovS. FeganR. FerschJ. A. FlemingN. GevorgyanG. P. GilfoyleK. L. GiovanettiF. X. GirodJ. T. GoetzW. GohnE. GolovatchR. W. GotheK. A. GriffioenM. GuidalN. GulerL. GuoK. HafidiH. HakobyanC. HanrettyN. HarrisonD. HeddleK. HicksD. HoM. HoltropC. E. HydeY. IlievaD. G. IrelandB. S. IshkhanovE. L. IsupovH. S. JoK. JooD. KellerM. KhandakerA. KimF. J. KleinS. KoiralaA. KubarovskyV. KubarovskyS. E. KuhnS. V. KuleshovS. LewisH. Y. LuM. MacCormickI . J . D. MacGregorD. MartinezM. MayerB. McKinnonT. MineevaM. MirazitaV. MokeevR. A. MontgomeryK. MoriyaH. MoutardeE. MunevarC. Munoz CamachoP. Nadel-TuronskiR. NasseripourS. NiccolaiG. NiculescuI. NiculescuM. OsipenkoA. I. OstrovidovL. L. PappalardoR. ParemuzyanK. ParkS. ParkE. PhelpsJ. J. PhillipsS. PisanoO. PogorelkoS. PozdniakovJ. W. PriceS. ProcureurD. ProtopopescuA. J. R. PuckettM. RipaniG. RosnerP. RossiF. SabatiéM. S. SainiC. SalgadoD. SchottR. A. SchumacherE. SederH. SeraydaryanY. G. SharabianE. S. SmithG. D. SmithD. I. SoberD. SokhanS. StepanyanS. StrauchW. TangC. E. TaylorYe TianS. TkachenkoH. VoskanyanE. VoutierN. K. WalfordM. H. WoodN. ZachariouL. ZanaJ. ZhangZ. W. ZhaoI. Zonta

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.