Paper detail

Degrees of freedom for combining regression with factor analysis

In the AGEMAP genomics study, researchers were interested in detecting genes related to age in a variety of tissue types. After not finding many age-related genes in some of the analyzed tissue types, the study was criticized for having low power. It is possible that the low power is due to the presence of important unmeasured variables, and indeed we find that a latent factor model appears to explain substantial variability not captured by measured covariates. We propose including the estimated latent factors in a multiple regression model. The key difficulty in doing so is assigning appropriate degrees of freedom to the estimated factors to obtain unbiased error variance estimators and enable valid hypothesis testing. When the number of responses is large relative to the sample size, treating the estimated factors like observed covariates leads to a downward bias in the variance estimates. Many ad-hoc solutions to this problem have been proposed in the literature without the backup of a careful theoretical analysis. Using recent results from random matrix theory, we derive a simple, easy to use expression for degrees of freedom. Our estimate gives a principled alternative to ad-hoc approaches in common use. Extensive simulation results show excellent agreement between the proposed estimator and its theoretical value. Applying our methodology to the AGEMAP genomics study, we found an order of magnitude increase in the number of significant genes. Although we focus on the AGEMAP study, the methods developed in this paper are widely applicable to other multivariate models, and thus are of independent interest.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.