Paper detail

Deconstructing Queue-Based Mutual Exclusion

We formulate a modular approach to the design and analysis of a particular class of mutual exclusion algorithms for shared memory multiprocessor systems. Specifically, we consider algorithms that organize waiting processes into a queue. Such algorithms can achieve O(1) remote memory reference (RMR) complexity, which minimizes (asymptotically) the amount of traffic through the processor-memory interconnect. We first describe a generic mutual exclusion algorithm that relies on a linearizable implementation of a particular queue-like data structure that we call MutexQueue. Next, we show two implementations of MutexQueue using O(1) RMRs per operation based on synchronization primitives commonly available in multiprocessors. These implementations follow closely the queuing code embedded in previously published mutual exclusion algorithms. We provide rigorous correctness proofs and RMR complexity analyses of the algorithms we present.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.