BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Wojciech Golab

Wojciech Golab contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingDatabases

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Deconstructing Queue-Based Mutual Exclusion

We formulate a modular approach to the design and analysis of a particular class of mutual exclusion algorithms for shared memory multiprocessor systems. Specifically, we consider algorithms that organize waiting processes into a queue. Such algorithms can achieve O(1) remote memory reference (RMR) complexity, which minimizes (asymptotically) the amount of traffic through the processor-memory interconnect. We first describe a generic mutual exclusion algorithm that relies on a linearizable implementation of a particular queue-like data structure that we call MutexQueue. Next, we show two implementations of MutexQueue using O(1) RMRs per operation based on synchronization primitives commonly available in multiprocessors. These implementations follow closely the queuing code embedded in previously published mutual exclusion algorithms. We provide rigorous correctness proofs and RMR complexity analyses of the algorithms we present.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On the k-Atomicity-Verification Problem

Modern Internet-scale storage systems often provide weak consistency in exchange for better performance and resilience. An important weak consistency property is k-atomicity, which bounds the staleness of values returned by read operations. The k-atomicity-verification problem (or k-AV for short) is the problem of deciding whether a given history of operations is k-atomic. The 1-AV problem is equivalent to verifying atomicity/linearizability, a well-known and solved problem. However, for k > 2, no polynomial-time k-AV algorithm is known. This paper makes the following contributions towards solving the k-AV problem. First, we present a simple 2- AV algorithm called LBT, which is likely to be efficient (quasilinear) for histories that arise in practice, although it is less efficient (quadratic) in the worst case. Second, we present a more involved 2-AV algorithm called FZF, which runs efficiently (quasilinear) even in the worst case. To our knowledge, these are the first algorithms that solve the 2-AV problem fully. Third, we show that the weighted k-AV problem, a natural extension of the k-AV problem, is NP-complete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Minuet: A Scalable Distributed Multiversion B-Tree

Data management systems have traditionally been designed to support either long-running analytics queries or short-lived transactions, but an increasing number of applications need both. For example, online games, socio-mobile apps, and e-commerce sites need to not only maintain operational state, but also analyze that data quickly to make predictions and recommendations that improve user experience. In this paper, we present Minuet, a distributed, main-memory B-tree that supports both transactions and copy-on-write snapshots for in-situ analytics. Minuet uses main-memory storage to enable low-latency transactional operations as well as analytics queries without compromising transaction performance. In addition to supporting read-only analytics queries on snapshots, Minuet supports writable clones, so that users can create branching versions of the data. This feature can be quite useful, e.g. to support complex "what-if" analysis or to facilitate wide-area replication. Our experiments show that Minuet outperforms a commercial main-memory database in many ways. It scales to hundreds of cores and TBs of memory, and can process hundreds of thousands of B-tree operations per second while executing long-running scans.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Toward a Principled Framework for Benchmarking Consistency

Large-scale key-value storage systems sacrifice consistency in the interest of dependability (i.e., partition tolerance and availability), as well as performance (i.e., latency). Such systems provide eventual consistency,which---to this point---has been difficult to quantify in real systems. Given the many implementations and deployments of eventually-consistent systems (e.g., NoSQL systems), attempts have been made to measure this consistency empirically, but they suffer from important drawbacks. For example, state-of-the art consistency benchmarks exercise the system only in restricted ways and disrupt the workload, which limits their accuracy. In this paper, we take the position that a consistency benchmark should paint a comprehensive picture of the relationship between the storage system under consideration, the workload, the pattern of failures, and the consistency observed by clients. To illustrate our point, we first survey prior efforts to quantify eventual consistency. We then present a benchmarking technique that overcomes the shortcomings of existing techniques to measure the consistency observed by clients as they execute the workload under consideration. This method is versatile and minimally disruptive to the system under test. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate this tool on Cassandra.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

A Complexity Separation Between the Cache-Coherent and Distributed Shared Memory Models

We consider asynchronous multiprocessor systems where processes communicate by accessing shared memory. Exchange of information among processes in such a multiprocessor necessitates costly memory accesses called \emph{remote memory references} (RMRs), which generate communication on the interconnect joining processors and main memory. In this paper we compare two popular shared memory architecture models, namely the \emph{cache-coherent} (CC) and \emph{distributed shared memory} (DSM) models, in terms of their power for solving synchronization problems efficiently with respect to RMRs. The particular problem we consider entails one process sending a "signal" to a subset of other processes. We show that a variant of this problem can be solved very efficiently with respect to RMRs in the CC model, but not so in the DSM model, even when we consider amortized RMR complexity. To our knowledge, this is the first separation in terms of amortized RMR complexity between the CC and DSM models. It is also the first separation in terms of RMR complexity (for asynchronous systems) that does not rely in any way on wait-freedom---the requirement that a process makes progress in a bounded number of its own steps.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Linearizable Implementations Do Not Suffice for Randomized Distributed Computation

Linearizability is the gold standard among algorithm designers for deducing the correctness of a distributed algorithm using implemented shared objects from the correctness of the corresponding algorithm using atomic versions of the same objects. We show that linearizability does not suffice for this purpose when processes can exploit randomization, and we discuss the existence of alternative correctness conditions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access