Paper detail

Deconfined Quantum Criticality, Scaling Violations, and Classical Loop Models

Numerical studies of the Néel to valence-bond solid phase transition in 2D quantum antiferromagnets give strong evidence for the remarkable scenario of deconfined criticality, but display strong violations of finite-size scaling that are not yet understood. We show how to realise the universal physics of the Neel-VBS transition in a 3D classical loop model (this includes the interference effect that suppresses Néel hedgehogs). We use this model to simulate unprecedentedly large systems (of size $L\leq 512$). Our results are compatible with a direct continuous transition at which both order parameters are critical, and we do not see conventional signs of first-order behaviour. However, we find that the scaling violations are stronger than previously realised and are incompatible with conventional finite-size scaling over the size range studied, even if allowance is made for a weakly/marginally irrelevant scaling variable. In particular, different determinations of the anomalous dimensions $η_\text{VBS}$ and $η_\text{Néel}$ yield very different results. The assumption of conventional finite-size scaling gives estimates which drift to negative values at large $L$, in violation of unitarity bounds. In contrast, the behaviour of correlators on scales much smaller than $L$ is consistent with large positive anomalous dimensions. Barring an unexpected reversal in behaviour at still larger sizes, this implies that the transition, if continuous, must show unconventional finite-size scaling, e.g. from a dangerously irrelevant scaling variable. Another possibility is an anomalously weak first-order transition. By analysing the renormalisation group flows for the non-compact $CP^{n-1}$ model ($n$-component Abelian Higgs model) between two and four dimensions, we give the simplest scenario by which an anomalously weak first-order transition can arise without fine-tuning of the Hamiltonian.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.