Paper detail

CuSbSe2 photovoltaic devices with 3% efficiency

Recent technical and commercial successes of existing thin film solar cell technologies motivates exploration of next-generation photovoltaic (PV) absorber materials. Of particular scientific interest are compounds like CuSbSe$_2$, which do not have the conventional tetrahedral semiconductor bonding. Here, we demonstrate 1.5 μm thick CuSbSe$_2$ PV prototypes prepared at 380-410°C by a self-regulated sputtering process using the conventional substrate device architecture. The p-type CuSbSe$_2$ absorber has a 1.1 eV optical absorption onset, ~$10^{5}$ cm$^{-1}$ absorption coefficient at 0.3 eV above the onset, and a hole concentration of ~10$^{17}$ cm$^{-3}$. The promising >3% energy conversion efficiency (Jsc = 20 mA/cm$^2$, FF = 0.44, Voc = 0.35 V) in these initial devices is limited by bulk recombination that limits photocurrent, device engineering issues that affect fill factor, and a photovoltage deficit that likely results from the non-ideal CuSbSe2/CdS band offset.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.