Paper detail

Current-temperature scaling for a Schottky interface with non-parabolic energy dispersion

In this paper, we study the Schottky transport in narrow-gap semiconductor and few-layer graphene in which the energy dispersions are highly non-parabolic. We propose that the contrasting current-temperature scaling relation of $J\propto T^2$ in the conventional Schottky interface and $J\propto T^3$ in graphene-based Schottky interface can be reconciled under Kane's $\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{p}$ non-parabolic band model for narrow-gap semiconductor. Our new model suggests a more general form of $J\propto \left(T^2 + γk_BT^3 \right)$, where the non-parabolicty parameter, $γ$, provides a smooth transition from $T^2$ to $T^3$ scaling. For few-layer graphene, it is found that $N$-layers graphene with $ABC$-stacking follows $J\propto T^{2/N+1}$ while $ABA$-stacking follows a universal form of $J\propto T^3$ regardless of the number of layers. Intriguingly, the Richardson constant extracted from the Arrhenius plot using an incorrect scaling relation disagrees with the actual value by two orders of magnitude, suggesting that correct models must be used in order to extract important properties for many novel Schottky devices.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.