Paper detail

Current Status and Future Prospects of the SNO+ Experiment

SNO+ is a large liquid scintillator-based experiment located 2km underground at SNOLAB, Sudbury, Canada. It reuses the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory detector, consisting of a 12m diameter acrylic vessel which will be filled with about 780 tonnes of ultra-pure liquid scintillator. Designed as a multipurpose neutrino experiment, the primary goal of SNO+ is a search for the neutrinoless double-beta decay (0$νββ$) of 130Te. In Phase I, the detector will be loaded with 0.3% natural tellurium, corresponding to nearly 800 kg of 130Te, with an expected effective Majorana neutrino mass sensitivity in the region of 55-133 meV, just above the inverted mass hierarchy. Recently, the possibility of deploying up to ten times more natural tellurium has been investigated, which would enable SNO+ to achieve sensitivity deep into the parameter space for the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy in the future. Additionally, SNO+ aims to measure reactor antineutrino oscillations, low-energy solar neutrinos, and geoneutrinos, to be sensitive to supernova neutrinos, and to search for exotic physics. A first phase with the detector filled with water will begin soon, with the scintillator phase expected to start after a few months of water data taking. The 0$νββ$ Phase I is foreseen for 2017.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
SNO+ Collaboration:S. AndringaE. ArushanovaS. AsahiM. AskinsD. J. AutyA. R. BackZ. BarnardN. BarrosE. W. BeierA. BialekS. D. BillerE. BlucherR. BonventreD. BraidE. CadenE. CallaghanJ. CaravacaJ. CarvalhoL. CavalliD. ChauhanM. ChenO. ChkvoretsK. ClarkB. ClevelandI. T. CoulterD. CressyX. DaiC. DarrachB. Davis-PurcellR. DeenM. M. DepatieF. DescampsF. Di LodovicoN. DuhaimeF. DuncanJ. DungerE. FalkN. FatemighomiR. FordP. GorelC. GrantS. GrullonE. GuillianA. L. HallinD. HallmanS. HansJ. HartnellP. HarveyM. HedayatipourW. J. HeintzelmanR. L. HelmerB. HreljacJ. HuT. IidaC. M. JacksonN. A. JelleyC. JillingsC. JonesP. G. JonesK. KamdinT. KaptanogluJ. KasparP. KeenerP. KhaghaniL. KippenbrockJ. R. KleinR. KnapikJ. N. KofronL. L. KormosS. KorteC. KrausC. B. KraussK. LabeI. LamC. LanB. J. LandS. LangrockA. LaTorreI. LawsonG. M. LefeuvreE. J. LemingJ. LidgardX. LiuY. LiuV. LozzaS. MaguireA. MaioK. MajumdarS. ManeckiJ. ManeiraE. MarzecA. MastbaumN. McCauleyA. B. McDonaldJ. E. McMillanP. MekarskiC. MillerY. MohanE. MonyM. J. MottramV. NovikovH. M. O'KeeffeE. O'SullivanG. D. Orebi GannM. J. ParnellS. J. M. PeetersT. PershingZ. PetriwG. PriorJ. C. ProutyS. QuirkA. ReicholdA. RobertsonJ. RoseR. RoseroP. M. RostJ. RumleskieM. A. SchumakerM. H. SchwendenerD. ScislowskiJ. SecrestM. SeddighinL. SeguiS. SeibertT. ShantzT. M. ShokairL. SibleyJ. R. SinclairK. SinghP. SkensvedA. SoerensenT. SonleyR. StainforthM. StraitM. I. StringerR. SvobodaJ. TatarL. TianN. TolichJ. TsengH. W. C. TseungR. Van BergE. Vázquez-JáureguiC. VirtueB. von KrosigkJ. M. G. WalkerM. WalkerO. WasalskiJ. WaterfieldR. F. WhiteJ. R. WilsonT. J. WinchesterA. WrightM. YehT. ZhaoK. Zuber
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

SNO+ Collaboration:S. AndringaE. ArushanovaS. AsahiM. AskinsD. J. AutyA. R. BackZ. BarnardN. BarrosE. W. BeierA. BialekS. D. BillerE. BlucherR. BonventreD. BraidE. CadenE. CallaghanJ. CaravacaJ. CarvalhoL. CavalliD. ChauhanM. ChenO. ChkvoretsK. ClarkB. ClevelandI. T. CoulterD. CressyX. DaiC. DarrachB. Davis-PurcellR. DeenM. M. DepatieF. DescampsF. Di LodovicoN. DuhaimeF. DuncanJ. DungerE. FalkN. FatemighomiR. FordP. GorelC. GrantS. GrullonE. GuillianA. L. HallinD. HallmanS. HansJ. HartnellP. HarveyM. HedayatipourW. J. HeintzelmanR. L. HelmerB. HreljacJ. HuT. IidaC. M. JacksonN. A. JelleyC. JillingsC. JonesP. G. JonesK. KamdinT. KaptanogluJ. KasparP. KeenerP. KhaghaniL. KippenbrockJ. R. KleinR. KnapikJ. N. KofronL. L. KormosS. KorteC. KrausC. B. KraussK. LabeI. LamC. LanB. J. LandS. LangrockA. LaTorreI. LawsonG. M. LefeuvreE. J. LemingJ. LidgardX. LiuY. LiuV. LozzaS. MaguireA. MaioK. MajumdarS. ManeckiJ. ManeiraE. MarzecA. MastbaumN. McCauleyA. B. McDonaldJ. E. McMillanP. MekarskiC. MillerY. MohanE. MonyM. J. MottramV. NovikovH. M. O'KeeffeE. O'SullivanG. D. Orebi GannM. J. ParnellS. J. M. PeetersT. PershingZ. PetriwG. PriorJ. C. ProutyS. QuirkA. ReicholdA. RobertsonJ. RoseR. RoseroP. M. RostJ. RumleskieM. A. SchumakerM. H. SchwendenerD. ScislowskiJ. SecrestM. SeddighinL. SeguiS. SeibertT. ShantzT. M. ShokairL. SibleyJ. R. SinclairK. SinghP. SkensvedA. SoerensenT. SonleyR. StainforthM. StraitM. I. StringerR. SvobodaJ. TatarL. TianN. TolichJ. TsengH. W. C. TseungR. Van BergE. Vázquez-JáureguiC. VirtueB. von KrosigkJ. M. G. WalkerM. WalkerO. WasalskiJ. WaterfieldR. F. WhiteJ. R. WilsonT. J. WinchesterA. WrightM. YehT. ZhaoK. Zuber

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.