Paper detail

Crystallographic splitting theorem for band representations and fragile topological photonic crystals

The fundamental building blocks in band theory are band representations (BRs): bands whose infinitely-numbered Wannier functions are generated (by action of a space group) from a finite number of symmetric Wannier functions centered on a point in space. This work aims to simplify questions on a multi-rank BR by splitting it into unit-rank bands, via the following crystallographic splitting theorem: being a rank-$N$ BR is equivalent to being splittable into a finite sum of bands indexed by $\{1,2,\ldots,N\}$, such that each band is spanned by a single, analytic Bloch function of $k$, and any symmetry in the space group acts by permuting $\{1,2,\ldots,N\}$. Applying this theorem, we develop computationally efficient methods to determine whether a given energy band (of a tight-binding or Schrödinger Hamiltonian) is a BR, and, if so, how to numerically construct the corresponding symmetric Wannier functions. Thus we prove that rotation-symmetric topological insulators in class AI are fragile, meaning that the obstruction to symmetric Wannier functions is removable by addition of BRs. An implication of fragility is that its boundary states, while robustly covering the bulk energy gap in finite-rank tight-binding models, are unstable if the Hilbert space is expanded to include all symmetry-allowed representations. These fragile insulators have photonic analogs that we identify; in particular, we prove that an existing photonic crystal built by Yang et al. [Nature 565, 622 (2019)] is fragile topological with removable surface states, which disproves a widespread perception of 'topologically-protected' surface states in time-reversal-invariant, gapped photonic/phononic crystals. Our theorem is finally applied to derive various symmetry obstructions on the Wannier functions of topological insulators, and to prove their equivalence with the nontrivial holonomy of Bloch functions.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.