Paper detail

Critical polynomials in the nonplanar and continuum percolation models

Exact or precise thresholds have been intensively studied since the introduction of the percolation model. Recently the critical polynomial $P_{\rm B}(p,L)$ was introduced for planar-lattice percolation models, where $p$ is the occupation probability and $L$ is the linear system size. The solution of $P_{\rm B} = 0$ can reproduce all known exact thresholds and leads to unprecedented estimates for thresholds of unsolved planar-lattice models. In two dimensions, assuming the universality of $P_{\rm B}$, we use it to study a nonplanar lattice model, i.e., the equivalent-neighbor lattice bond percolation, and the continuum percolation of identical penetrable disks, by Monte Carlo simulations and finite-size scaling analysis. It is found that, in comparison with other quantities, $P_{\rm B}$ suffers much less from finite-size corrections. As a result, we obtain a series of high-precision thresholds $p_c(z)$ as a function of coordination number $z$ for equivalent-neighbor percolation with $z$ up to O$(10^5)$, and clearly confirm the asymptotic behavior $zp_c-1 \sim 1/\sqrt{z}$ for $z \rightarrow \infty$. For the continuum percolation model, we surprisingly observe that the finite-size correction in $P_{\rm B}$ is unobservable within uncertainty O$(10^{-5})$ as long as $L \geq 3$. The estimated threshold number density of disks is $ρ_c = 1.436 325 05(10)$, slightly below the most recent result $ρ_c = 1.436 325 45(8)$ of Mertens and Moore obtained by other means. Our work suggests that the critical polynomial method can be a powerful tool for studying nonplanar and continuum systems in statistical mechanics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.