Abstract
By using a combined amplitude analysis of the and data, we demonstrate that the , which is quoted as a state in the Particle Data Group table, is favored by the data to be a state appearing in both channels, which means that the and the can be regarded as the same state. Meanwhile, the data also prefer a large helicity-0 contribution of this tensor resonance to the amplitudes instead of the helicity-2 dominance assumed by {\it BABAR}, which may indicate a sizable portion of non- components in this state. Identifying the with the and abandoning the helicity-2 dominance for this tensor state are helpful for the further understandings of the properties of this state and also of the mysterious "" charmoniumlike resonances.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.