Source author record

Zhi-Yong Zhou

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

hep-ph hep-ex nucl-th hep-lat math-ph math.MP quant-ph

Catalog footprint

Research overview

10works

7topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2022arXiv

Scrutinizing $ππ$ scattering in light of recent lattice phase shifts

In this paper, the $IJ=00, 11, 20$ partial wave $ππ$ scattering phase shifts determined by the lattice QCD approach are analyzed by using a novel dispersive solution of the S-matrix, i.e. the PKU representation, in which the unitarity and analyticity of scattering amplitudes are automatically satisfied and the phase shifts are conveniently decomposed into the contributions of the cuts and various poles, including bound states, virtual states and resonances. The contribution of the left-hand cut is estimated by the $SU(2)$ chiral perturbation theory to $\mathcal{O}(p^4)$ . The Balanchandran-Nuyts-Roskies relations are considered as constraints to meet the requirements of the crossing symmetry. It is found that the $IJ=00$ $ππ$ scattering phase shifts obtained at $m_π=391$ MeV by Hadron Spectrum Collaboration (HSC) reveal the presence of both a bound state pole and a virtual state pole below the $ππ$ threshold rather than only one bound state pole for the $σ$ . To reproduce the lattice phase shifts at $m_π=391$ MeV, a virtual-state pole in the $IJ=20$ channel is found to be necessary in order to balance the left-hand cut effects from the chiral amplitudes. Similar discussions are also carried out for the lattice results with $m_π=236$ MeV from HSC. The observed behaviors of the pole positions with respect to the variation of the pion masses can provide deep insights into our understanding of the dynamical origin of $σ$ resonance.

preprint2020arXiv

Decays of $X(3872)$ to $χ_{cJ}π^0$ and $J/ψπ^+π^-$

By describing the $X(3872)$ using the extended Friedrichs scheme, in which $D\bar D^*$ is the dominant component, we calculate the decay rates of the $X(3872)$ to $π^0$ and a $P$ -wave charmonium $χ_{cJ}$ state with $J=0,1$ , or $2$ , and its decays to $J/ψπ^+π^-$ where $π^+π^-$ are assumed to be produced via an intermediate $ρ$ state. The decay widths of $X(3872)\toχ_{cJ}π^0$ for $J=0,1,2$ are of the same order. However, this model calculation exhibits that the decay rate of $X(3872)$ to $χ_{c1}π^0$ is one order of magnitude smaller than its decay rate to $J/ψπ^+π^-$ .

preprint2020arXiv

Does the bottomonium counterpart of $X(3872)$ exist?

A narrow line shape peak at about 10615 MeV, just above the threshold in the $B\bar B^*$ channel, which can be regarded as the signal of bottomonium counterpart of $X(3872)$ , $X_b$ , is predicted by using the extended Friedrichs scheme. Though a virtual state is found at about 10593 MeV in this scheme, we point out that the peak is contributed mainly by the coupling form factor, which comes from the convolution of the interaction term and meson wave functions including the one from $χ_{b1}(4P)$ , but not mainly by the virtual-state pole. In this picture, the reason why $X_b$ signal is not observed in the $Υπ^+π^-$ and $Υπ^+π^-π^0$ channels can also be understood. The $χ_{b1}(4P)$ mass and width are found to be about 10771 MeV and 6 MeV, respectively and a dynamically generated broad resonance is also found with its mass and width at about 10672 MeV and 78 MeV, respectively. The line shapes of these two states are also affected by the form factor effect. Thus, this study also emphasizes the importance of the structure of the wave functions of high radial excitations in the analysis of the line shapes, and provides a caveat that some signals may be generated from the structures of the form factors rather than from poles.

preprint2020arXiv

QCD sum rule studies on the $s s \bar s \bar s$ tetraquark states of $J^{PC} = 0^{-+}$

We apply the method of QCD sum rules to study the $s s \bar s \bar s$ tetraquark states of $J^{PC} = 0^{-+}$ . We construct all the relevant $s s \bar s \bar s$ tetraquark currents, and find that there are only two independent ones. We use them to further construct two weakly-correlated mixed currents. One of them leads to reliable QCD sum rule results and the mass is extracted to be $2.51^{+0.15}_{-0.12}$ GeV, suggesting that the $X(2370)$ or the $X(2500)$ can be explained as the $ss\bar s\bar s$ tetraquark state of $J^{PC} = 0^{-+}$ . To verify this interpretation, we propose to further study the $ππ/K \bar K$ invariant mass spectra of the $J/ψ\to γππη^\prime/γK \bar K η^\prime$ decays in BESIII to examine whether there exists the $f_0(980)$ resonance.

preprint2019arXiv

Possible molecular states in $B^{()}B^{()}$ scatterings

We present that, if unitarizing the $B^{(*)}B^{(*)}$ scattering amplitudes in the constituent interchange model, one can find two bound state poles for $(I_{tot},S_{tot})=(0,1)$ $BB^*$ and $B^*B^*$ system, which corresponds to two $I(J^P)=0(1^+)$ doubly bottomed molecular states. Furthermore, it is noticed that the virtual states in $(1,0)$ $BB$ , $(1,1)$ $BB^*$ , $(1,0)$ $B^*B^*$ , and $(1,2)$ $B^*B^*$ systems could produce enhancements of the module squares of the scattering $T$ -matrix just above the related thresholds, which might correspond to $I(J^P)=1(0^+)$ , $1(1^+)$ , and $1(2^+)$ doubly bottomed molecular states, respectively. The calculation may be helpful for searching for the doubly bottomed molecular state in future experiments.

preprint2016arXiv

Virtual states and generalized completeness relation in the Friedrichs Model

We study the well-known Friedrichs model, in which a discrete state is coupled to a continuum state. By examining the pole behaviors of the Friedrichs model in a specific form factor thoroughly, we find that, in general, when the bare discrete state is below the threshold of the continuum state, there should also be a virtual-state pole accompanying the bound-state pole originating from the bare discrete state as the coupling is turned on. There are also other second-sheet poles originating from the singularities of the form factor. We give a general argument for the existence of these two kinds of states. As the coupling is increased to a certain value, the second-sheet poles may merge and become higher-order poles. We then discuss the completeness relations incorporating bound states, virtual states, and resonant states corresponding to higher-order poles.

preprint2015arXiv

Could the $X(3915)$ and the $X(3930)$ Be the Same Tensor State?

By using a combined amplitude analysis of the $γγ\rightarrow D\bar{D}$ and $γγ\rightarrow J/ψω$ data, we demonstrate that the $X(3915)$ , which is quoted as a $J^{PC}=0^{++}$ state in the Particle Data Group table, is favored by the data to be a $J^{PC}=2^{++}$ state appearing in both channels, which means that the $X(3915)$ and the $X(3930)$ can be regarded as the same $J^{PC}=2^{++}$ state. Meanwhile, the data also prefer a large helicity-0 contribution of this tensor resonance to the amplitudes instead of the helicity-2 dominance assumed by {\it BABAR}, which may indicate a sizable portion of non- $q\bar q$ components in this state. Identifying the $X(3915)$ with the $X(3930)$ and abandoning the helicity-2 dominance for this tensor state are helpful for the further understandings of the properties of this state and also of the mysterious " $XYZ$ " charmoniumlike resonances.

preprint2015arXiv

Distinguishing cusp effects and near-threshold-pole effects

We make use of a unitarized coupled-channel model to analyze the mass distribution data of final states in production processes of $X(4260)$ . By analyzing the analytical structures of the decay amplitudes, we find that the line shape of $Z_c(3900)$ signal is related to the combined effect of a pair of near-threshold "shadow" poles and the $(D\bar{D}^*)^\pm$ thresholds, in which the third-sheet pole might provide a dominant contribution. As all the coupled channels effects are tuning off, the trajectories of these two poles suggest that the $Z_c(3900)$ might originate from the attractive interaction of $(D^*\bar{D}^*)^\pm$ through a long-distance interaction, $e.g.$ $π$ -exchange interaction, as a "deuteron-like" state. There is no nearby pole structure corresponding to the $Z_c(4025)$ signal in the $(D^*\bar{D}^*)^\pm$ mass distribution.

preprint2013arXiv

Comprehending heavy charmonia and their decays by hadron loop effects

We present that including the hadron loop effects could help us to understand the spectrum of the heavier charmonium-like states and their decays simultaneously. The observed states could be represented by the poles on the complex energy plane. By coupling to the opened thresholds, the pole positions are shifted from the bare states predicted in the quenched potential model to the complex energy plane. The pole masses are generally pulled down from the bare masses and the open-charm decay widths are related to the imaginary parts of the pole positions. Moreover, we also analyze the pole trajectory of the $χ_{c1}(2P)$ state while the quark pair production rate from the vacuum changes in its uncertainty region, which indicates that the enigmatic X(3872) state may be regarded as a $1^{++}$ $c\bar{c}$ charmonium-dominated state dressed by the hadron loops as the others.

preprint2011arXiv

Hadron loops effect on mass shifts of the charmed and charmed-strange spectra

The hadron loop effect is conjectured to be important in understanding discrepancies between the observed states in experiments and the theoretical expectations of non-relativistic potential model. We present that, in an easily operable procedure, the hadron loop effect could shift the poles downwards to reduce the differences and provide better descriptions of both the masses and the total widths, at least, of the radial quantum number $n=1$ charmed and charmed-strange states. The $1^1P_1-1^3P_1$ mixing phenomena could be naturally explained due to their couplings with common channels. The newly observed $D$ states are also addressed, but there are still some problems remaining unclear.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Zhi-Yong Zhou

Research overview

Is this your work?

10 publications

Scrutinizing $ππ$ scattering in light of recent lattice phase shifts

Decays of $X(3872)$ to $χ_{cJ}π^0$ and $J/ψπ^+π^-$

Does the bottomonium counterpart of $X(3872)$ exist?

QCD sum rule studies on the $s s \bar s \bar s$ tetraquark states of $J^{PC} = 0^{-+}$

Possible molecular states in $B^{()}B^{()}$ scatterings

Virtual states and generalized completeness relation in the Friedrichs Model

Could the $X(3915)$ and the $X(3930)$ Be the Same Tensor State?

Distinguishing cusp effects and near-threshold-pole effects

Comprehending heavy charmonia and their decays by hadron loop effects

Hadron loops effect on mass shifts of the charmed and charmed-strange spectra

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Zhi-Yong Zhou

Research overview

Is this your work?

10 publications

Scrutinizing ππππππ scattering in light of recent lattice phase shifts

Decays of X(3872)X(3872)X(3872) to χcJπ0χ_{cJ}π^0χcJ​π0 and J/ψπ+π−J/ψπ^+π^-J/ψπ+π−

Does the bottomonium counterpart of X(3872)X(3872)X(3872) exist?

QCD sum rule studies on the sssˉsˉs s \bar s \bar ssssˉsˉ tetraquark states of JPC=0−+J^{PC} = 0^{-+}JPC=0−+

Possible molecular states in B(∗)B(∗)B^{(*)}B^{(*)}B(∗)B(∗) scatterings

Virtual states and generalized completeness relation in the Friedrichs Model

Could the X(3915)X(3915)X(3915) and the X(3930)X(3930)X(3930) Be the Same Tensor State?

Distinguishing cusp effects and near-threshold-pole effects

Comprehending heavy charmonia and their decays by hadron loop effects

Hadron loops effect on mass shifts of the charmed and charmed-strange spectra

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Scrutinizing $ππ$ scattering in light of recent lattice phase shifts

Decays of $X(3872)$ to $χ_{cJ}π^0$ and $J/ψπ^+π^-$

Does the bottomonium counterpart of $X(3872)$ exist?

QCD sum rule studies on the $s s \bar s \bar s$ tetraquark states of $J^{PC} = 0^{-+}$

Possible molecular states in $B^{()}B^{()}$ scatterings

Could the $X(3915)$ and the $X(3930)$ Be the Same Tensor State?