Paper detail

Conical stochastic maximal $L^p$-regularity for $1 \leq p \lt \infty$

Let $A = -{\rm div} \,a(\cdot) \nabla$ be a second order divergence form elliptic operator on $\R^n$ with bounded measurable real-valued coefficients and let $W$ be a cylindrical Brownian motion in a Hilbert space $H$. Our main result implies that the stochastic convolution process $$ u(t) = \int_0^t e^{-(t-s)A}g(s)\,dW(s), \quad t\ge 0,$$ satisfies, for all $1\le p<\infty$, a conical maximal $L^p$-regularity estimate $$\E \n \nabla u \n_{ T_2^{p,2}(\R_+\times\R^n)}^p \le C_p^p \E \n g \n_{ T_2^{p,2}(\R_+\times\R^n;H)}^p.$$ Here, $T_2^{p,2}(\R_+\times\R^n)$ and $T_2^{p,2}(\R_+\times\R^n;H)$ are the parabolic tent spaces of real-valued and $H$-valued functions, respectively. This contrasts with Krylov's maximal $L^p$-regularity estimate $$\E \n \nabla u \n_{L^p(\R_+;L^2(\R^n;\R^n))}^p \le C^p \E \n g \n_{L^p(\R_+;L^2(\R^n;H))}^p$$ which is known to hold only for $2\le p<\infty$, even when $A = -Δ$ and $H = \R$. The proof is based on an $L^2$-estimate and extrapolation arguments which use the fact that $A$ satisfies suitable off-diagonal bounds. Our results are applied to obtain conical stochastic maximal $L^p$-regularity for a class of nonlinear SPDEs with rough initial data.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.